Answer:
b.
but i am not sure
Explanation:
The purpose of hypothesis testing is to test whether the null hypothesis (there is no difference, no effect) can be rejected or approved. If the null hypothesis is rejected, then the research hypothesis can be accepted.
Answer:
All of them
Explanation:
The king condemning his own peaceful actions to be the cause of violence is in complete contradiction to one another. An oddity occurs and the action is in complete contrast to the outcome. One cannot justify that the corresponding actions may have led to the specific outcome. such is also the case in the example:
a; condemning a robbed man for having too much money does in no way justifies the action of robbing. Blaming a source that was done only for the reason of ones own satisfaction.
b; condemning Socrates for his truth to force people to make him drink the hemlock, is as absurd as the above example.
c; condemning Jesus for his devotion to God shows that the intention of the action was completely different but the outcome was in complete contrast.
Answer:
evaluating and revising the decision
Explanation:
Evaluating and revising decision involve analyzing the result of the decision that we made in the past in order to find out whether the solution that we implemented to address it is efficient.
From the excerpt above, we can infer that Alejandro already made a couple of decisions on how to use his money for the month, but only find out that the cost is larger that he would want it to be by the end of the month. To handle this, it is best for Alejandro to analyze his past decision and find out which things he could change to cut down his cost.
The view that social change arises due to the inequalities between the haves and the have not is based on social cognitive theory of change.
<h3>What is social cognitive theory?</h3>
Experiences of individuals, other people's acts, and environmental circumstances all have an impact on one's health practices, according to the theory of social cognitive.
It claims that we learn from others by observing them. This statement states that seeing others in social interactions contributes to a person's knowledge.
Inequalities between haves and have-nots lead to change. Furthermore, according to this viewpoint, dominant organizations tend to utilize their authority to exploit others who do not.
Learn more about social cognitive theory, here:
brainly.com/question/26425192
#SPJ1
