1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ziro4ka [17]
3 years ago
8

How did Cold War rhetoric influence the social movements? a. The activists did not like the ideal presented by the rhetoric and

wanted to create an anarchist society. b. People were too spoiled and just wanted more material goods; the rhetoric told the rest of the world that the U.S. was perfect. c. The Cold War rhetoric had no influence on the social movements. d. Activists sought to make the rhetoric of a free and equal American society that supports democracy throughout the world a reality.
History
1 answer:
vovangra [49]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

d. Activists sought to make the rhetoric of a free and equal American society that supports democracy throughout the world a reality.

Explanation:

The Cold War rhetoric influence the social movements in a way that "Activists sought to make the rhetoric of a free and equal American society that supports democracy throughout the world a reality."

The Cold War Rhetoric is a body of work written by the likes of Martin J. Medhurst, Robert L. Ivie, Philip Wander, and Robert L. All of them gathered to produce something related to the cold war's strategy, metaphor, and ideology.

You might be interested in
Based on the pie charts, how do global greenhouse gas emissions differ from US greenhouse gas emissions?
oksano4ka [1.4K]

Answer:

The answer is most likely A but read it first because A could be C

Explanation:

The world emits more greenhouse gas in the agriculture sector than the United States.

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why is oligarchy important?
dlinn [17]

OligarchyHome  Social Sciences and the Law  Political Science and Government  Political Science: Terms and ConceptsInternational Encyclopedia...International Encyclopedia...The Columbia Encyclopedia,...The Oxford Pocket Dictionary...Further reading<span>TOOLS </span>Oligarchy<span>International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences | </span>1968COPYRIGHT 2008 Thomson Gale.Oligarchy

bibliography

The word “oligarchy” and the concepts which it symbolizes originated in ancient Greece. In its basic use, the word identified one of the general forms of government recognized by the Greeks: that in which political government is conducted by a few persons or families. It was also used more narrowly, by Aristotle for example, to refer to the debased form of aristocracy, that is, to government by the few or by a faction. The term “oligarchy” was also used to refer to the small group of persons who enjoyed a monopoly of political control in oligarchic governments; the term usually had the added sense that the oligarchy ruled in its own rather than in the public interest. For Aristotle, classification of governments rested on two independent variables: the number of persons who ruled and the purposes served by their rule. Oligarchy was present when a few persons ruled for their own satisfaction.

Development of the concept. The original uses of the term were associated with particular social and political regimes and with intellectual modes of analyzing them. Typically, societies were small and traditional and rested on established classes, including a slave class. Within Greek cities citizenship status often identified a large but still minority class that could at least claim to participate in political decisions. Whatever the changes in political forms, this “upper class” was relatively stable by reason of property holding, authority relations with other classes, social position, and so on, and oligarchy could reasonably be expected to be succeeded by other known forms of government. Classical analysts found oligarchies to be endemic among ancient states, but they viewed them as unstable since they rested on military, economic, and leadership factors which were transitory as compared with the continuing forces which supported the relatively large upper classes in traditionalist societies.

In the modern view, these classical conceptions, including oligarchy and the ideas associated with it, are far too simple for effective analysis. Indeed, classical writing makes it clear that the conceptions based on the formal structure of governments were not adequate even then, in spite of the particular emphasis given to form. Greek analysts dealt with the phenomena of power, with the importance of procedures, and, of course, with the paramount role of values. These matters were merged with discussions of political form, but the elements were not clearly discriminated. The subtleties and complexities of Greek political thought do not appear to good advantage in this particular classificatory system.

6 0
3 years ago
36. Identify two characteristics of Nationalism.
ella [17]

The term “nationalism” is generally used to describe two phenomena: (1) the attitude that the members of a nation have when they care about their national identity, and (2) the actions that the members of a nation take when seeking to achieve (or sustain) self-determination.

8 0
3 years ago
What was the League of Nations?<br> Why was it formed?
Natali5045456 [20]

Answer:

The League of Nations (1919 – 1946) was the first non-governmental international organization, founded during the Paris Peace Conference in 1919.

Its main objective was to maintain world peace after World War I.

Explanation:

The League had three main organs: the secretariat (led by the Secretary-General), the Council, and the Assembly and a large number of commissions and agencies.

The other goals of the League were: preventing war through collective security, resolving disputes between countries through diplomacy, and improving global well-being.

The most important achievements of the League were: resolving a dispute between Sweden and Finland, preventing the economic crisis in Austria and the outbreak of the war in the Balkans, and supporting the administrative division of the Saar region in Germany.

With the onset of World War II, The League of Nation failed in its essential objective - to prevent future world wars and aggression. During the war, the Assembly did not hold meetings, the Secretariat from Geneva was reduced to a minimum and relocated most of its employees to North America. After World War II the League was replaced with the United Nations.

4 0
3 years ago
What was a benefit of slash-and-burn farming during the Neolithic era? Slash-and-burn farming removed unwanted wildlife from an
PtichkaEL [24]

Answer:

The benifit = <em><u>Land could be cleared quickly and enriched with ash from the fires</u></em><em><u>.</u></em>

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the right balance of power in good government???
    8·1 answer
  • What is the lasting legacy of W. E. B. Du Bois?
    7·1 answer
  • Lifestyle of the people in the northeast, the west, and the south in the years 1800 to 1840
    8·2 answers
  • Taxation without representation is tyranny.<br> Why did James Otis make this statement? (5 points)
    5·2 answers
  • Of the jobs described which one would you most want to do? explain
    13·2 answers
  • Why are political parties important to the american political system?
    12·1 answer
  • How did napoleon build and defend his empire?
    9·1 answer
  • The system of mass production in manufacturing developed rapidlyly
    8·2 answers
  • Reasons for building up the US military?
    7·1 answer
  • What do historians call the image below?
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!