Answer:
(1) Skinner’s utopian society ought to be rejected.
Explanation:
The sentence that expresses the conclusion of the argument is, <em>Skinner’s utopian society ought to be rejected</em>. "The sort of society Skinner proposes in Walden Two is a non-competitive, lifeless society that lacks creativity and imagination. It also lacks the conditions that make for festivity and fantasy, two significant human traits. The type of society that Skinner proposes would turn people into robots. Skinner’s utopian society ought to be rejected."
Lincoln Steffens, Jane Addams, Upton Sinclair, Ida Tarbell, Jacob Riis,
C. playing a ball game with stone hoops
Answer:
B The ordinance is narrowly tailored to serve an important government interest and does not unreasonably limit alternative channels of communication.
Explanation:
The court will base its decision on its determination that the ordinance is narrowly tailored to serve an important government interest and does not unreasonably limit alternative channels of communication. While the First Amendment protects the freedoms of speech and assembly, the government may reasonably regulate speech-related conduct in public forums through content‑neutral time, place, and manner regulation. Here, the ban on camping overnight in the park, a content-neutral regulation of a public forum, would be evaluated by the court based on if the ordinance is narrowly tailored to serve an important government interest and does not unreasonably limit alternative channels of communication. In this scenario, the question would be if the ban on the use of the park will limit alternative channels of communicating the message of the scout leader and if yes the ban may be lifted and if not, it will not be lifted.
