Answer:
c. "But their sacrifice brought results. Slowly, but surely, restaurants throughout the South began to abandon their policies of segregation."
Explanation:
The question above is related to the "sit-in movement" that happened in the USA (starting <em>1960</em>). The movement was a non-violent one and it was meant to give the African-Americans the<u> same, equal rights with the white peopl</u>e. It took many sacrifices before the movement showed results.
It started with the lunch-counter sit-in in Greensboro, North Carolina. This was followed by other people in the USA who also did the tactics as a support for desegregation of races. Though it took time, the restaurants throughout the South began to abandon their policies of segregation. This statement best supports the idea regarding the violence that the activists endured while doing the movement. The people who participated were subjected to<em> verbal abuse </em>and<em> assault</em>, but they suffered in order to achieve a <em>greater cause.</em>
Answer:this job is not the best. It stinks and almost plugs my nose. When i come home for the day, I am pretty sure I am nose blind. The garbage bags are hard on my back and I think I will need to go to the chiropractor after I take a quick nap. If I don't do this job, I will not be able to pay for this month's rent. I have to keep going. It takes up most of my homework time too. I barely get any time to sneak in some studying. The only bright side of this job is that my best friend Bono is doing this with me. He has to get out of the way of his parents sometimes. Especially when they take up almost all of his house with their jobs. Half the time they are not there and they leave a mess. Most days Bono just lives with me. I have to keep this job if I want to keep on staying under a roof.
(there you go)
Answer:
The soldier is pointing out that:
a) It is often conflicting.
Explanation:
If people who are fighting against you open fire and kill you, we can say you were killed by enemy fire, since it was the enemy who shot. Thus, friendly fire means being killed by your friends, not by your enemy. However, <u>when the soldier says, "I don't know why they call it friendly fire if it kills you," he is paying more attention to the literal meaning of "friendly". "Friendly" can refer to people who are nice and kind. But it can also refer to something that is not harmful. If a product does not harm nature, we say it is environment-friendly. From this perspective, it does seem weird to call "friendly fire" something that is harmful, that can kill you. Thus, to this soldier, terminology used at war seems conflicting.</u>
Tom Walker would not give the devil the gold
Proper Noun: A name used for an individual person, place, or organization, spelled with initial capital letters, e.g.,Larry, Mexico, and Boston Red Sox.
