1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
seropon [69]
2 years ago
7

Drag each tile to the correct box

History
1 answer:
Nutka1998 [239]2 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Asia = Sri Lanka

North America = Costa Rica

Africa = Botswana

Europe = Great Britain

Explanation:

I just took the post-test on Edmentum and got it correct.

You might be interested in
Manifest Destiny, a phrase coined in 1845, is the idea that the United States is destined—by God, its advocates believed—to expa
monitta
True!! I believe it is true, it should be
7 0
2 years ago
Which of the following describes challenges Nixon faced in his domestic policies?
Masja [62]

Answer:

The economic phenomenon of stagflation

7 0
2 years ago
What is the effect of child labor on the US economy?
kodGreya [7K]

The main law regulating child labor in the United States is the Fair Labor Standards Act. For non-agricultural jobs, children under 14 may not be employed, children between 14 and 16 may be employed in allowed occupations during limited hours, and children between 16 and 18 may be employed for unlimited hours in non-hazardous occupations.[1] A number of exceptions to these rules exist, such as for employment by parents, newspaper delivery, and child actors.[1] The regulations for agricultural employment are generally less strict.

The economics of child work involves supply and demand relationships on at least three levels: the supply and demand of labor on the national (and international) level; the supply and demand of labor at the level of the firm or enterprise; the supply and demand for labor (and other functions) in the family. But a complete picture of the economics of child labor cannot be limited to simply determining supply and demand functions, because the political economy of child labor varies significantly from what a simple formal model might predict. Suppose a country could effectively outlaw child labor. Three consequences would follow: (1) the families (and the economy) would lose the income generated by their children; (2) the supply of labor would fall, driving up wages for adult workers; and (3) the opportunity cost of a child’s working time would shrink, making staying in school (assuming schools were available) much more attractive. In principle, a virtuous circle would follow: with more schooling, the children would get more skills and become more productive adults, raising wages and family welfare.20 To the extent that the demand for labor is elastic, however, the increase in wages implies that the total number of jobs would fall.  

The labor supply effects are the basic outline of the logic that underlies almost all nations’ laws against child labor, as well as the international minimum age standard set in ILO Convention 138 and much of the anti-child labor statements during the recent protests against the World Trade Organization, World Bank and International Monetary Fund. This model does describe in very simplified form the long-term history of child work in the economic development of developed economies. But in the short-term, the virtuous circle seldom occurs in real life as quickly as the simple, static model suggests. The reason for the model’s short-term failure is that child work results from a complex interweaving of need, tradition, culture, family dynamics and the availability of alternative activities for children.

History suggests that children tend to work less, and go to school more, as a result of several related economic and social trends. the political economy of a place plays at least as big a part as per capita income in determining the level of child labor there.


3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
One of the main groups in the early 1800s to object morally to slavery was the
SashulF [63]
I think the answer is
A. Southern plantation owners
6 0
2 years ago
Trust busting laws were focused on big companies that were A. On the verge of going bankrupt B. Treating competitors fairly C. W
Volgvan

Answer:

The Correct Answer is D

Explanation:

  • Trust busting is a government actively seeking to dissolve cooperates trusts and monopolies.
  • Teddy Roosevelt saw a difference between good and bad trust. His main goal was to dissolve the bad trust.
  • Bad trust would lower their prices to drive competition out of the businesses and use or apply other unfair methods of business practices. he used the Sherman Antitrust act as his guide.

 

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • explain the significance of the twelve tables and the the law of nations to the development of political thought
    12·1 answer
  • Which fleet improvements were introduced into the navy near the end of the cold war?
    7·1 answer
  • In which location was a battle in the Spanish-American War?
    11·2 answers
  • I just got a 73 because the reel answer is a and c
    10·1 answer
  • How does Sanskrit relate to Hinduism?
    7·1 answer
  • A new city ordinance that bans pit bulls
    12·2 answers
  • Can u tell me the answers for all of the questions?
    14·1 answer
  • as a result of far-flung theaters of combat people from all over Europe Asia Africa the Pacific and the Americas came into direc
    14·2 answers
  • True or False: Segregation was the reason Jessie Owens wasn't allowed to
    6·1 answer
  • What role does the law of supply and demand play in a command economy? A. The law of supply and demand functions in reverse beca
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!