Answer:
Skeptical
Explanation:
It isn't comprehensible since it would mean that there were high chances of raining. It is skeptical because it means that the person didn't thought it would rain, there for that person was surprised when it rained.
It looks as though this essay should be an argumentative/persuasive essay. As such, there are two main ways to construct this. Knowing you should refute two points from the article, you could do this by either mentioning the opposing viewpoints first then your refutes (known as the block method), or you could do this point by point by stating an opposing viewpoint, then refuting it in the same paragraph (known as the point-by-point method). That said, here are two sample outlines assuming you mention two points:
OUTLINE 1 (Block Method)
Introduction
Body Paragraph 1
-opposing viewpoint 1
-opposing viewpoint 2
Body Paragraph 2
-your refute of opposing viewpoint 1
-your refute of opposing viewpoint 2
Conclusion
OUTLINE 2 (Point-by-Point)
Introduction
Body Paragraph 1
-opposing viewpoint 1
-your refute of opposing viewpoint 1
Body Paragraph 2
-opposing viewpoint 2
-your refute of opposing viewpoint 2
Conclusion
Animals helped her because she sees in pictures. Since animals do not have language, their memories have to be sensory-based instead of word-based. She felt less confused. Hope I helped! ;)
Spurt- short burst of energy, and if you add growth, meaning you grow
Runt- That's a pig, or like a bay pig
You need
better peripheral vision
you need to think faster you can only read as fast as you can think
and you need to see better if you need to stop to fix ur glasses then ur wasting time
