History has shown us that Sun Yat-Sen and Yuan Shigai <u>did </u><u>not share </u><u>the same </u><u>motives </u><u>for </u><u>supporting </u><u>the provisional </u><u>government</u><u>. </u>
<h3>Sun Yat-Sen and Yuan Shigai in 1911</h3>
- Both men were very influential in calls for the end of the Qing dynasty.
- Sun Yat-Sen was a strong believer in the need for China to modernize and change its governance in other to develop.
While Sun Yat-Sen had better motives for China in mind, Yuan Shigai did not and when he took over, he became increasingly authoritarian and even tried to proclaim himself emperor.
In conclusion, they did not have the same motives.
Find out more on Sun Yat-Sen at brainly.com/question/780808.
Answer:
After people were asked not to sit in the seat behind the drivers in honor of Rosa Parks' fight for the Civil Rights movement, some people did actually sit in that seat. Making the assumption that these people were prejudiced or racist is an example of the correspondence bias.
Explanation:
On December 1st, 1955, Rosa Parks was commuting back home by bus, when the driver asked her and three other African Americans to stand up from their seats so that white passengers could seat there. While the three other passengers complied with the driver's order, Rosa Parks denied to do so, which ended up with her arrest, and later on with a social movement that decided to boycott the buses in Montgomery during Rosa Parks' trial. Although most of the people decided to leave the first seat behind the driver empty in honor of Rosa Parks, some of them actually seat on it anyways. Assuming that these people were racists is an example of a correspondence bias. A correspondence bias is the tendency to draw inferences about a person's personality based on a unique and specific observed behavior. There are many circumstances and reasons as to why that people sat on the seat that was meant to be empty that would not make them instantly perceived as racist or prejudiced, but assuming that they are based on that one action would be an example of a correspondence bias.
Answer:
During the rule of Menes, the combined crown of Upper and Lower Egypt became the symbol of a unified Egypt, the white symbolic of Upper Egypt and the red of Lower Egypt. This symbolizes the establishment of the first dynasty in Egypt, making Menes the first pharaoh.
<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, <span>the correct response would be the one having to do with the idea that they make people on welfare lazy and dependent on "government handouts", although this has been wildly discredited. </span></span>
One of Ataturk's reforms in Turkey was to reject Religion in laws and government
Answer Choice B.
