Answer:
Answer:B Place the decimal point after 2
Explanation:
All you have to do is multiply 3.12 times 4
Answer:
150000
Explanation:
The question says that Harry received a fair market value = 450000 dollars
Meanwhile he transferred 650000 dollars of assets
Fair value of assets = 650000 - 200000 = 450000
Harry's adjusted basis = 350000
Therefore the share received will be:
350,000 - 200,000
= 150,000 dollars.
Harry's basis in the stock received from the corporation is $150,000.
Thank you!
12.0 years will take for these bonds to mature.
What is a coupon in bonds?
The term "coupon," which is also sometimes referred to as "coupon payment," refers to the annual interest rate that is paid on a bond from the date of issuance until maturity. It is described as being a percentage of the bond's face value. When discussing coupons, the coupon rate is frequently employed.
How does coupon rate affect bond price?
The price of bonds is significantly influenced by the coupon rate on a bond in comparison to current market interest rates. Bond prices increase when a coupon is more than the current interest rate; prices decrease when a coupon is lower.
Learn more about coupon in bonds: brainly.com/question/22504216
#SPJ4
Answer:
George is on a<u> fixed interval</u>
Mai Ling is on a <u>fixed ratio</u>
Explanation:
A schedule is the delivery rate or frequency of a booster.
A fixed interval refers to the amount of time the reinforcement delivery rate has occurred over a predictable period of time, such as George, who is paid weekly for his work.
A fixed ratio occurs when rewards are delivered on a consistent schedule basis. As in the case of Mai Ling who gets paid after certain completed tasks, which corresponds to the number of tasks she performs to receive certain reinforcement.
Answer:
Yes, because the corporation remains liable to the owner under the contract
Explanation:
The above answer is true because in this case, there is no limit to the assignment of the contractual rights between the two parties, hence this assignment of a contract would be treated as both an assignment of rights and a delegation of duties.
Therefore, while the corporation in this case has delegated its duties and assigned its rights under the contract to the developer by assigning the contract to the developer, the corporation is still considered to be liable to the owner for payment of the purchase price.
And given the fact that the developer is not as creditworthy as the corporation, and thus there is a greater chance that the developer will be unable to pay the purchase price, the owner has the rights under the contract arrangement to contractually compel the corporation to do so.
