Answer:
1. Inside the dorm room, the movies are <em>Non-Rival</em> which means that one person can watch the movie and it will not diminish the ability of others to watch as well.
Also as they are all in the same dorm, the showing of the movie is <em>Non-Excludable</em> as well because no one can stop the other from watching.
Public good is both Non-Rival and Non-Excludable so the showing of a movie IS a public good.
2.
Musashi Sean Bob Eric Total Willingness to pay
10 9 8 3 30
8 7 6 2 23
6 5 4 1 16
4 3 2 0 9
2 1 0 0 3
The optimal number of movies that can be rented is dependent on their total willingness to pay. If their Total willingness to pay for the movie is above $8 which is the cost of a movie, then they will get it. From the table, the fifth movie is below the price of $8 so they <u>should rent 4 movie</u>s.
3. If they rent 4 movies and there are 4 of them then the cost per person is;
= (8 *4)/4 people
= 24/4
= $8
This means that each roommate will pay <u>$8</u>.
Answer:
Cash flow is the net amount of cash and cash-equivalents being transferred into and out of a business. At the most fundamental level, a company's ability to create value for shareholders is determined by its ability to generate positive cash flows, or more specifically, maximize long-term free cash flow
Explanation:
Answer:
c) AICPA accounting and auditing guide, Audits of Colleges and Universities and/or AICPA SOP 74-8, Financial Accounting and Financial Reporting by Colleges and Universities.
Explanation:
As accounting and auditing guide which is issued by AICPA for health care 3 gives full guidance on how to deal with financial reporting issues for the hospital so the accountant would look into it for any problem related to it.
Answer:
C) if the court finds that Shawn has substantially performed, he will be able to recover the contract price less any damages caused by his failure to perform as promised.
Explanation:
From the question Harry signed a contract with Shawn to build a house. Harry made some specification to build the house. But Shawn did not follow the specifications now Harry doesn't want to pay him the contract amount.
Under doctrine of specific performance, Harry can pay less money than the contract price. Because Shawn has performed substantially, he is not entitled to receive the contract price as agreed.