Answer:
Part-to-whole relationship- city: state – state : country.
Item-category relationship- St. Bernard : dog – eagle : bird.
Cause and effect relationship- sliver : pain – heat : boil.
Explanation:
The different categorization of relationships determines the connection of the items or elements to each other. And it also helps organize them and understand their analogical position.
In the given examples, the city, state, and country constitute the <u>part-to-whole relationship</u>. This is because the city is a part of the state, which is, in turn, a part of the country.
The<u> item-category relationship</u> is shown in St. Bernard and eagle, where they are categorized according to their belonging. St. Bernard belonging to the dog category and the eagle to a bird presents the item-category relationship.
And the <u>cause and effect relationship</u> is seen in the relationship of the "sliver: pain" and "heat: boil" pairs. They present the cause and effect of that cause.
I would say that the answer would be D. The conjunction would be the word yet.
Answer:
1. Where, messages, receive? - Where are messages received?
2. How, newspapers, deliver? - How are newspapers delivered?
Third conditional. If the students hadn't been late for the exam, they would have passed.
Second conditional. If the weather weren't so cold, we could go to the beach.
Third conditional. If she had had a laptop with her, she could have emailed me.
First conditional. If she doesn't go to the meeting, I won't go either.
Second conditional. If Lucy had enough time, she would travel more.
Explanation:
The first part of this question concerns the passive voice. <u>When we use the passive voice, the subject is not the one performing the action expressed by the verb. In the present tense, the passive voice consists of the verb to be plus the past participle of the main verb.</u>
The second part of this question concerns conditionals. <u>Sentences in the first conditional use an if-clause in the simple present. The consequence is expressed in the simple future. In the second conditional, the if-clause uses the simple past, while the consequence uses would/could/might plus the main verb. Finally, the third conditional uses the past perfect in the if-clause. The consequence uses would/could/might + have + past participle of the main verb.</u>
Assuming that this is referring to the same passage that was posted before with this question, the editorial writer's main point is that "The mayor and city council have made a serious mistake in selecting a site for a new community theater" since he expresses this more than once.
<span>Movies and books have similarities and
differences; but it seems that the differences outweigh the similarities. Both can
be used to express fiction; entertain; and be enjoyed by young and old alike. However,
books and movies differ in the use of imagination; duration or length of time; audience;
and interpretation.</span>
Fiction can be told through books and
movies. In fact, a number of movies are adaptations of the novel or book form. <u>Maze Runners</u> and <u>Harry Potter</u> are examples of books turned into movies. Secondly, both
are forms of entertainment. Reading fiction or watching a movie entertain us
and make us relax. Finally, both can be enjoyed by the young and the old. There
is no age limit to being able to get access to books and movies especially now
that we have the Internet.
On the other hand, in matters of the
use of imagination, the printed form can be limitless. Since movies are visually
presented, the audience becomes a passive spectator of the series of events and
characters presented to him. Secondly, books take time to finish depending on the
age and reading speed of the readers. In contrast, movies can be done in an
hour or two. There are even Indie (independent) films that are less than an
hour in length. Thirdly, books can only be enjoyed by a single person; while
movies can be shared with friends and loved ones at home or in the cinemas
which can be more fun. Finally, in matters of interpretation, the printed form
can have more details that the interpretation could be different depending on
the reader’s age, experience and culture. However, movies are often interpreted
by the director or producers and have to suit certain conditions such as
budget, target audience, and censorship.
Overall, despite the differences,
books and movies have undeniably been great companions of human experience,
where a person can escape into some place and time that he can control. Whether
the story has a tragic or happy ending, it is still worth our time and
experience.
Personally, I prefer good movies spent
on Friday nights with my friends. Nothing can beat the relaxing time spent
sharing popcorn and soda.
