The answer to this question is bias.
This bias is most likely caused by the negative enforcement that caused from the memory of your ex-fiancee.
Due to this negative enforcement, you will associate everything relevant to your fiancee as something distasteful, including her origin.
Answer:John at IBM America is likely to exhibit social loafing.
Explanation:
According to research, a Collectivistic culture as seen in countries like China, Korea, and Japan, is one that characterized by group prioritization above personal interest while Individualistic culture as seen in countries like United States is one characterized by individual's needs before group goals.
Also, Social loafing is a situation where an individual put less effort when working as a group to perform a task to achieve a goal, but may give his best when working solely on the project.
From the definitions above, its likely that an individual with a social loafing mindset may come from an individualistic culture as seen in a country like United States. Therefore, we can infer that John at IBM America is likely to exhibit social loafing.
Unauthorized disclosure of Confidential information could be expected to jeopardise national security. Unauthorized disclosure of Secret information could have serious consequences for national security.
Tests for confidentiality determine whether unauthorised disclosure is possible. When performing confidentiality tests, you are attempting to determine whether data is being disclosed to people for whom it was not intended. Confidentiality testing ensures that authentication and encryption mechanisms function in accordance with security requirements. Proper authentication ensures that only authorised users can access the system and view the data.
To know more about Unauthorized disclosure here-
brainly.com/question/17198718
#SPJ4
Answer:
Type I error
Explanation:
Type I error is a statistical significance. It does not prove the correct result in a research hypothesis. Here the p-value is based on the probabilities.
In this phenomenon, there are always chances of making an incorrect conclusion. It is related to accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis.
In this research, there are another four options possibilities in which there are two correct and two incorrect error representation. These errors are inversely proportioned.
