The correct answer is true. It is because if the contract
term is likely ambiguous, the court will likely consider this as an extrinsic
evidence or that the ambiguity is likely to be interpreted against the party
who is responsible for drafting the term.
Not sure but because I don’t know your answer right now I’ll make sure to know it next time.
Explanation:
i=interest rate
X=current rate
2X = double current rate
n = number of years
Calculate time it takes to double at 3%:
2X = X(1+i)^n
simplify by cancelling out X
(1+i)^n = 2
substitute i = 3%
(1.03)^n =2
take log
n*log(1.03) = log(2)
n = log(2)/log(1.03) = 0.6931/0.02956 = 23.45 years
Similarly, for growth rate of 7%,
n = log(2)/log(1.07) = 0.6931 / 0.06766 = 10.24 years
So the difference is 23.45-10.24 = 13.21 years (to the hundredth) sooner
The net operating income as per the variable costing method is $14500
<u>Explanation:</u>
The unit product cost is = $18 + $10 + $4 = $32
Sales revenue ( $78 multiply with 8700 units) = $678600
Variable cost:
Variable cost of goods sold ( 8700 units multiply $32) = $278400
Variable selling and administartive (8700 units multiply $5) = $43500
contribution margin = $356700
fixed manufacturing overhead = $255200
Fixed selling and adminstrative expenses = $87000
Net operating income = $14500
<u>Note:</u> contribution margin is calculated after deducting sales revenue with variable cost