1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Usimov [2.4K]
3 years ago
10

"Overwhelmed, she wondered how she would break the news to her family and friends"

English
2 answers:
MrRa [10]3 years ago
8 0

The answer is D on God

abbyduck
2 years ago
lol its the ong for me and thxxxx so much the answer was right♥
melisa1 [442]3 years ago
6 1
The answer to the question is A).
abbyduck
2 years ago
your dumb the answers d like MrRa[10] said
You might be interested in
Subtract using the number line.
Roman55 [17]

the anwser  should be 2-7


8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Explain how the request of Claudius and Gertrude upon Rosencrantz and Guildenstern is similar to the mission given to Reynaldo b
Vesna [10]

Both of these requests are similar in the sense that they both involve parents asking others to monitor their children and be attentive to what they are doing. Polonius wants someone to watch over Ophelia, while Claudius and Gertrude want Rosencratz and Guildenstern to watch over Hamlet. Shakespeare wants to show how, even though both of these are requests of parents who want their child watched, the intention and consequences in each case are very different.

4 0
3 years ago
PLZ!!! PROMISE TO GIVE BRAIN ⚠⚠⚠
Shtirlitz [24]

Answer:

You have already gotten your imformation. But here's how to set it up.

Explanation:

Step one: What side are you on .....Is it important to care for animals??? What do you think.

Step two-Find evidence to support your side.

Step Three-Use strong words like I and I strongly disagree and words that will really help the reader understand what you are saying.

Remember you are trying to get the reader on your side.Use The set up Racacer  Restate, answer, cite evidence, explain your evidence, cite more evidence ,explian that evidence ,restate and summaries what you just wrote. End in do you agree or disagree with me??/

5 0
2 years ago
Should guns be banned in the public? Write an essay on the yes side or the no side ALSO, BRAINLIEST IS ON THE LINE, PLEASE HELP
Kitty [74]

Answer:

see explanation

Explanation:

Since the ratification of the second amendment in 1791, citizens of the United States have been given the right to bear arms. To purchase a gun, buyers must go through a background check to ensure they are not a criminal. Most people have access to buying guns as the process is fairly simple. Guns should not be banned in public because they provide self defense, make the carrier feel safer, and most gun owners have gone through training to use the gun.  

To begin with, although background checks are in place before purchasing firearms, criminals could find ways to own a gun illegally. If a felon gets possession of a gun and enters a public place with malicious intentions, many people could be hurt and even killed. The police may be too far away to spare every life; however, if there is a good person in the area that is armed with a gun, they could use it and stop the situation before innocent people are killed.  

In addition, the owner of a firearm may feel safer knowing they can protect themselves and others. For example, if a bad situation were to occur, the gun bearer would feel much more at ease knowing that they could save themselves. When walking alone at night or entering a high risk area, a gun could be the difference between saving their own life or getting killed.  

Finally, the majority of gun owners go through a gun safety and training course. This is to ensure they know how to use a gun and so they do not make any deadly mistakes when handling one. Some may not have had professional training, but instead have had a friend or family member show them how to use a firearm. Either way, gun owners are aware of how to fire, reload, and overall handle the weapon.

In conclusion, guns should be allowed in public spaces because it makes the owner feel at ease, can save lives, and the gun owners are trained in using a gun. Feeling safe is important when in public. Guns are also used as a means of protection when in the right person’s hands. Most firearm owners have gone through some sort of training and know how to handle a gun. Guns are beneficial in public to save lives and should not be banned.  

7 0
3 years ago
Then came our dinner at the Lakeview restaurant.
VMariaS [17]

Answer:

the promotion happened first. since 'promoted' is in the past, it happened before the dinner

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • In what way does the hindenburg disaster demonstrate the effects that different media can have on a single event ?
    5·2 answers
  • Which answer is the sentence fragment?
    12·2 answers
  • "Saving the Red Apes"
    6·1 answer
  • What is dependence?
    8·1 answer
  • Can someone please help me out ​
    6·2 answers
  • Who is this it’s not Batman it’s from a game called Arkham night
    7·1 answer
  • 4. What would you say are Vita's 3 most important character traits?
    8·2 answers
  • E.L.A Argumentative Text
    9·1 answer
  • SIGAN A 3LT TRUENO in English FOLLOW 3lt thunder he is a super good u tuber play super well and it would be great if you subscri
    15·1 answer
  • Insert two dashes where needed.
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!