1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alborosie
3 years ago
8

The important things i found in this lesson are​

History
1 answer:
vredina [299]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The first quartile, denoted by

Q1 , is the median of the lower half of the data set. This means that about 25% of the numbers in the data set lie below  and about 75% lie above  .

The third quartile, denoted by Q3 , is the median of the upper half of the data set.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
How far was Nasser responsible for the outbreak of the Suez War of 1956? Please make it detailed i have to write a 600 word essa
dsp73

Answer:

The Suez crisis is often portrayed as Britain's last fling of the imperial dice.

Still, there were powerful figures in the "establishment" - a phrase coined in the early 1950s - who could not accept that Britain was no longer a first-rate power. Their case, in the context of the times, was persuasive: we had nuclear arms, a permanent seat on the UN security council, and military forces in both hemispheres. We remained a trading nation, with a vital interest in the global free passage of goods.

But there was another, darker, motive for intervention in Egypt: the sense of moral and military superiority which had accreted in the centuries of imperial expansion. Though it may now seem quaint and self-serving, there was a widespread and genuine feeling that Britain had responsibilities in its diminishing empire, to protect its peoples from communism and other forms of demagoguery.

Much more potently, there was ingrained racism. When the revolutionaries in Cairo dared to suggest that they would take charge of the Suez canal, the naked prejudice of the imperial era bubbled to the surface. The Egyptians, after all, were among the original targets of the epithet, "westernised oriental gentlemen. They were the Wogs.

King Farouk, the ruler of Egypt, was forced into exile in mid-1952. A year later, a group of army officers formally took over the government which they already controlled. The titular head of the junta was General Mohammed Neguib. The real power behind the new throne was an ambitious and visionary young colonel who dreamed of reasserting the dignity and freedom of the Arab nation, with Egypt at the heart of the renaissance. His name was Gamal Abdel Nasser.

Nasser's first target was the continued British military presence in the Suez canal zone. A source of bitter resentment among many Egyptians, that presence was a symbol of British imperial dominance since the 1880s. In 1954, having established himself as uncontested leader of Egypt, Nasser negotiated a new treaty, under which British forces would leave within 20 months.

At first, the largely peaceful transition of power in Egypt was little noticed in a world beset by turmoil and revolution.

Explanation:

Hope this helps.

7 0
3 years ago
Which statement best summarizes how the policy of allotment impacted American Indians?
frutty [35]

Answer:

Many American Indian families received 160 acres of land to farm.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
In the classic novel 20,00 Leagues Under the Sea, Captain Nemo roams the seas in his secret, technologically advanced submarine.
zvonat [6]
The resolution would be Captain Nemo's submarine sinks and the three men escape because it is the end of the story!!

Hope it helped :D
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In the 1800s, the US government wanted to keep the number of free states and slave states equal in order to
insens350 [35]
To maintain a balance in Congress between the number of representatives who supported slavery compared to those who opposed it
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
President Reagan’s speech at the Brandenburg gate commonlit
Shtirlitz [24]

Answer: here you go:

Explanation:

We come to Berlin, we American Presidents, because it's our duty to speak, in this place, of freedom. But I must confess, we're drawn here by other things as well: by the feeling of history in this city, more than 500 years older than our own nation; by the beauty of the Grunewald and the Tiergarten; most of all, by your courage and determination. Perhaps the composer, Paul Lincke, understood something about American Presidents. You see, like so many Presidents before me, I come here today because wherever I go, whatever I do: "Ich hab noch einen koffer in Berlin." [I still have a suitcase in Berlin.]

Our gathering today is being broadcast throughout Western Europe and North America. I understand that it is being seen and heard as well in the East. To those listening throughout Eastern Europe, I extend my warmest greetings and the good will of the American people. To those listening in East Berlin, a special word: Although I cannot be with you, I address my remarks to you just as surely as to those standing here before me. For I join you, as I join your fellow countrymen in the West, in this firm, this unalterable belief: Es gibt nur ein Berlin. [There is only one Berlin.]

...

And now the Soviets themselves may, in a limited way, be coming to understand the importance of freedom. We hear much from Moscow about a new policy of reform and openness. Some political prisoners have been released. Certain foreign news broadcasts are no longer being jammed. Some economic enterprises have been permitted to operate with greater freedom from state control. Are these the beginnings of profound changes in the Soviet state? Or are they token gestures, intended to raise false hopes in the West, or to strengthen the Soviet system without changing it? We welcome change and openness; for we believe that freedom and security go together, that the advance of human liberty can only strengthen the cause of world peace.

There is one sign the Soviets can make that would be unmistakable, that would advance dramatically the cause of freedom and peace. General Secretary Gorbachev, if you seek peace, if you seek prosperity for the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe, if you seek liberalization: Come here to this gate! Mr. Gorbachev, open this gate! Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!

...

As I looked out a moment ago from the Reichstag, that embodiment of German unity, I noticed words crudely spray-painted upon the wall, perhaps by a young Berliner, "This wall will fall. Beliefs become reality." Yes, across Europe, this wall will fall. For it cannot withstand faith; it cannot withstand truth. The wall cannot withstand freedom.

5 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following was the primary cause of the Balkan Wars conducted during the Clinton administration? A. The UN peacekeep
    15·1 answer
  • Where did the 2003 SARS outbreak originate?
    13·1 answer
  • Q: what was the purpose of the "black codes"?
    14·2 answers
  • The representative of the reigning monarch of the United Kingdom in both Australia and New Zealand is called the __________.
    13·2 answers
  • Briefly explain one major difference between leuchtenburg's and interrante's interpretations of cities and rural areas during th
    11·1 answer
  • Why did China and Japan close there boulders<br><br> Need Help ASAP Please
    15·1 answer
  • According to the circular flow diagram, the government buys
    9·2 answers
  • Select all that apply
    11·2 answers
  • Describe the causes and consequences of conflict between settlers and American Indians in early Washington history.
    8·1 answer
  • Which statement best completes the diagram
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!