Answer: Parramore used made the essay more convincing because it made the reader feel as if it was something they already knew was bad.
Explanation:
Throughout the essay the words and language that Parramore used made the essay more convincing because it made the reader feel as if it was something they already knew was bad. For example she says in page 32-33 “Surveillance has a way of dehumanizing workers.” which is very convincing when the reader reads
Answer:
1/1048576.
Explanation:
What is the probability of flipping a coin 20 times and getting 20 heads?
I'm assuming that the coin is balanced and has heads on one side and tails on the other. This means that P(head) = 1/2 and P(tail) = 1/2.
P(flipping a coin 20 times and getting 20 heads)
= (P(head))^20 = (1/2^)20
= 1/1048576
= 9.5367431640625×10^−7
True? Sorry if I’m not correct
The answer is D because the paragraph does not say he is hungry, an animal, or a lover. You can infer that Otis is shy since you don’t really talk to outgoing people like that.
