1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Lunna [17]
3 years ago
11

How was the pillage and gift system useful to nobles?

History
1 answer:
pav-90 [236]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

D. They could pay soldiers for their service with land rather than money.

Explanation:

The pillage and gift system consisted in the pillaging of conquered lands, and the gift of those lands to the soldiers who helped conquered them in first place.

As the functioning of the system implies, it was used by nobles to pay their soldiers with land instead of currency, since payments in currency form were not always convenient or possible because some nobles could not issue currency, or could do so, but at the cost of debasement and inflation.

You might be interested in
The battle of Midway was significant in that
RUDIKE [14]

Answer:

it marked a turning point of the war in the Pacific

Explanation:

hope this helps :)

5 0
3 years ago
The map shows the relationship between railroads and farmers. A map of the United notes titled Railroads and Farmers. Railroads
melamori03 [73]

Answer:

what??

Explanation:

please show a picture

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which statement best explains how the balance of state and federal power shifted under President Ronald Reagan?
Kay [80]
A) The federal government lost power over the states through the policy of new federalism.

The concept of New Federal was to transfer powers from the US federal government back to the state. The states were allowed to take a more active role in their own affairs.  New federalism involves the federal government providing a block grant to the State to resolve social issues but in return, <span>the federal government would monitor outcome as well as provide broad discretion to the states for how the programs were implemented. </span>
3 0
3 years ago
The Anti-Federalists were against
Alex73 [517]

Answer:

Hey there!

The Anti-Federalists were against <u>expansion of national power. </u>

Explanation:

In the ratification debate, the Anti-Federalists opposed to the Constitution. They complained that the new system threatened liberties, and failed to protect individual rights. The Anti-Federalists argued against the expansion of national power. One faction opposed the Constitution because they thought stronger government threatened the sovereignty of the states.

4 0
3 years ago
(Please answer ASAP need to get a test done :U) Italian-born navigator who served both Spain and Portugal. Mapmakers of the New
muminat
The answer would be C
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Who is the leader of the senate and also works with the president?what is the senate pro tempore?—not the actual name of the per
    10·1 answer
  • If you wanted to see exactly how high the Denver Bronco's "Mile High" stadium is, which of the following would you look at? A. P
    12·2 answers
  • Why did massachusetts and new york choose bicameral legislation
    9·1 answer
  • Which factors contributed to the beginning of the Enlightenment movement?
    11·1 answer
  • Which best explains how the Supremacy Clause is connected to federalism?
    9·1 answer
  • Identify the statements that describe how women contributed to the Revolutionary movement.
    15·1 answer
  • Lots of points!! What are some activities that you consider to be economic needs? And why?
    14·2 answers
  • Was the U.S practicing Isolationism before the attack on Pearl Harbor? Explain.
    6·1 answer
  • Which statement best summarizes the conflict in this passage?
    9·2 answers
  • How many gametes do llamas have
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!