Looking at all of the options available, only 2) is a criticism. The media sometimes ignores opposing views.
Saying the media is unbiased is not criticism, neither is saying they research their stories or use a variety of sources.
I hope this helps! :)
A: Ottomans advancing across Europe
was the biggest threat to the empire of Charles V?
The British was able to win the Seven Years wars through;
• Proper leadership through William Pitt who invested heavily in the war by increasing his control on North America. Louis XV of France was more occupied with his wife and court proceedings that diverted his attention on the colonies.
• Application of a different global strategy-William Pitt invested more money and resources in the conflict in the colonies.
• There was collaboration with authorities-Local authorities were granted control over supplies and recruitment of soldiers.
• British were having a better navy and controlled most of the harbors.
• The British had large numbers of soldiers and better resources.
1.Source: Excerpt from Olaudah Equiano’s “the interesting narrative of the life Olaudah Equiano, or Gustavas Vaasa, The African
2. This is a first hand account of a persons experience as a slave so it is a primary source, making it reliable
3. They did not come by choice, they were sold and forced to come to America on a slave ship
Because of their views on the nature of baptism and other issues, by both Magisterial Protestants and Roman Catholics.
