1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Dvinal [7]
2 years ago
13

Rounding factors to the greatest place results in this

Mathematics
1 answer:
san4es73 [151]2 years ago
3 0
Estimate is the answer
You might be interested in
A photograph has a width of 8 cm and a length of 3x cm.
enyata [817]
W*l=A

w=8
l=3x
8*3x= A

That would be the equation 
3 0
3 years ago
"A 12​-foot ladder is leaning against a building. If the bottom of the ladder is sliding along the pavement directly away from t
Svet_ta [14]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The question has typographical errors. The correct question is:

"A 12​-foot ladder is leaning against a building. If the bottom of the ladder is sliding along the pavement directly away from the building at 3 ​feet/second, how fast is the top of the ladder moving down when the foot of the ladder is 5 feet from the​ wall?

Solution:

The ladder forms a right angle triangle with the ground. The length of the ladder represents the hypotenuse.

Let x represent the distance from the top of the ladder to the ground(opposite side)

Let y represent the distance from the foot of the ladder to the base of the wall(adjacent side)

The bottom of the ladder is sliding along the pavement directly away from the building at 3ft/sec. This means that y is increasing at the rate of 3ft/sec. Therefore,

dy/dt = 3 ft/s

The rate at which x is reducing would be

dx/dt

Applying Pythagoras theorem which is expressed as

Hypotenuse² = opposite side² + adjacent side², it becomes

x² + y² = 12²- - - - - - - -1

Differentiating with respect to time, it becomes

2xdx/dt + 2ydy/dt = 0

2xdx/dt = - 2ydy/dt

Dividing through by 2x, it becomes

dx/dt = - y/x ×dy/dt- - - - - - - - - - 2

Substituting y = 5 into equation 1, it becomes

x² + 5 = 144

x² = 144 - 25 = 119

x = √119 = 10.91

Substituting x = 10.91, dy/dt = 3 and y = 5 into equation 2, it becomes

dx/dt = - 5/10.91 × 3

dx/dt = - 1.37 ft/s

7 0
3 years ago
Can someone help me please? Maybe give the answers?<br><br><br><br><br><br>Thank you.
pishuonlain [190]

Answer:

Finding the missing number is fairly simple and can be done in a few short steps. I will show you using the 21 / __ fraction.

First, divide the included number by its corresponding number in the original fraction.

21 ÷ 3 = 7

To find what the denominator of this would be, multiply 4 by 7.

4 * 7 = 28

The fraction would be 21 / 28.

This works with both numerators and denominators. If you need more of the answers just ask in the comments.


7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Find the number of three digit number which are not divisible by 5
iragen [17]

Answer:

777 is an example of a three digit number that is not divisible by 5

Step-by-step explanation:

777/5 = 155.4

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
let a = (a1, a2) and b = (b1, b2) and c = (c1,c2) be three non zero vectors. if a1b2 - a2b1 is not equal to 0. then show three a
Ksenya-84 [330]

Consider the contrapositive of the statement you want to prove.

The contrapositive of the logical statement

<em>p</em> ⇒ <em>q</em>

is

¬<em>q</em> ⇒ ¬<em>p</em>

In this case, the contrapositive claims that

"If there are no scalars <em>α</em> and <em>β</em> such that <em>c</em> = <em>α</em><em>a</em> + <em>β</em><em>b</em>, then <em>a₁b₂</em> - <em>a₂b₁</em> = 0."

The first equation is captured by a system of linear equations,

\begin{cases}c_1 = \alpha a_1 + \beta b_1\\ c_2 = \alpha a_2 + \beta b_2\end{cases}

or in matrix form,

\begin{pmatrix}c_1\\c_2\end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix}a_1&b_1\\a_2&b_2\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}\alpha\\\beta\end{pmatrix}

If this system has no solution, then the coefficient matrix on the right side must be singular and its determinant would be

\begin{vmatrix}a_1&b_1\\a_2&b_2\end{vmatrix} = a_1b_2-a_2b_1 = 0

and this is what we wanted to prove. QED

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How do I find the area of a trapezoid?
    10·2 answers
  • PLZ ANSWER ASAP. ILL GIVE 5 STARS&lt; GIVE BRAINLIEST AND THANK!!!
    15·1 answer
  • S+p+h=24<br><br> 4s+5p+6h=112<br><br> 10+s=p
    11·1 answer
  • Tim had 187 dollars to spend on 9 books. After buying them he had 18 dollars. How much did each book cost?
    15·2 answers
  • The perimeter of a rectangle is 32 inches. The length is 1 foot, what is the width of the rectangle in inches?
    7·1 answer
  • Simplify the expression (4x^3y^-5)^4 PLEASE HELP!!!!
    15·2 answers
  • What is 21 - 0.892 =
    10·2 answers
  • Which inequality is shown above?
    13·1 answer
  • Which statement BEST models the equation
    15·1 answer
  • When 36x^4 + 12x^8 is divided by 12x^4, the result is
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!