The answer would be D.
In the story, it shows that he leaned his basic numbers by helping his father count and sort the rocks, hinting that he didn’t have the time to go to school and had to learn things on his own, in his own way :)
Answer:
Shakespeare utilizes apparel imagery to underscore the contention among appearance and reality, a worry found in a large number of Shakespeare's plays. The play's blood imagery frequently fills in as a similitude for blame and reprisal and fills in as a ceaseless suggestion to the crowd that Macbeth's reign is soaked in blood.
Hope this helps
The liquid in the bottle <u>smells</u> like some kind of acid.
We can deduce here that the line from the passage that best supports the idea that money corrupts government is: "[Men] honor and look up to the rich man, and make a ruler of him."
<h3>What is a main idea?</h3>
Main idea actually refers to the central lesson or important message that an excerpt, passage, a line or a story is carrying. It refers to the message that the author wishes to pass across to the audience.
We see here that the passage that completes the question is:
The accumulation of gold in the treasury of private individuals is the ruin of timocracy [a state where only property owners can participate in government]; they invent illegal modes of expenditure; for what do they or their wives care about the law? . . . . And then one, seeing another grow rich, seeks to rival him, and thus the great mass of the citizens become lovers of money. . . . And so at last, instead of loving contention and glory, men become lovers of trade and money; they honor and look up to the rich man, and make a ruler of him, and dishonor the poor man.
Thus, the line that best supports the idea that that money corrupts government is "[Men] honor and look up to the rich man, and make a ruler of him."
Learn more about main idea on brainly.com/question/24572492
#SPJ1
Answer:
The case the United States v. Susan B. Anthony was a criminal case taken up against Susan B. Anthony after she attempted to vote. She was found guilty and told to pay a $100 fine, which she adamantly refused. One argument that the defendant, Susan B. Anthony, had was that the fourteenth amendment said that all people born in the united states were citizens and that states could not infringe on their "privileges and immunities of citizens" which includes voting (as seen in the fifteenth amendment). However, the court argued that those only pertained to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness as children were citizens but could not vote. Then, when faced with the fifteenth amendment the court said that since nowhere in the amendment is sex listed, women's right to vote was not protected.
