Answer:
a) P value = 0.0013
b) No, it is not plausible that the silicon content of the water is no greater than it was 10 years ago
Step-by-step explanation:
The null hypothesis here is “Mean is equal to 5” while alternate hypothesis is that “Mean is greater than 5”
Given
Mean = 5, x’ = 5.4 and sigma = 1.2 and n = 85
Z = x-u’/sigma/sqrt n
Substituting the given values, we get –
Z = 3.02
A) P value = 0.0013 which is less than 0.05 and thus we will reject the null hypothesis
B) There is enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis
3/12 • 4/12 is also another expression
Cos A would be 4/5, because that is a 3-4-5 right triangle
She could have hiked one 2 mile trail and one 1 mile trail or she could’ve hiked one 2.5 mile trail and another 0.5 mile trail