Jeff lives in a third-world country (Mexico). He is under a traditional economy. He likes to keep it simple, he doesn't get as much profit or surplus as he would in a different type of economy. However, Jeff is very socially satisfied and has a pronounced role in the economy. But, the other day he broke his leg and wasn't able to access doctors through technology, or even have access to Western Medicine. On the other hand, Jenna lives in North Korea. There the government controls everything like resouces, the factories, and equipment. Jenna almost never experiences enemployment as the government provides a steady flow of them. But, this whole process sometimes causes protests in her country, which the government then has to control. Both economies have advantages and disadvantages, Jeff and Jenna are pen pals.
The Ottoman Empire's government was consistently tolerant. The Mughal Empire's government waxed and waned between tolerance under some rulers and intolerance under others. The Safavid Empire was consistently intolerant
All of the given choices are correct. The British Parliament, though favoring the arrival of William and Mary, did not wish their reappearance under the laws of the absolute monarchy. A file called the Declaration of Rights was delivered to the king and queen before they were given the throne in 1689. That year, Parliament formalized the document naming it as the English Bill of Rights. It asserted the following:
Parliament would choose who ruled the country.
The ruler would be subject to parliamentary laws and could not announce or suspend any law.
The ruler could not enforce taxes or uphold an army in peacetime without Parliament's consent.
Parliament would meet often, and the ruler could not obstruct with the election of its members.
The Bill of Rights assured free speech for members of Parliament.
It also secure private citizens. Any citizen could request the government for reprieve of injustice. No citizen could be involuntary to pay unfairly high bail or face cruel or unusual sentence.
One advantage of being an unskilled worker in Egypt is becoming a slave. Being a slave would have been an easier task than building the pyramids.
I believe the answer is there was no executive branch of government.
The difference between a federation and a confederation, is that in a confederation, it is more of loosely tied together states that can leave at any time. Just look at the EU with Brexit. The UK is exercising it's right to leave. In an example of a federation, look at the US. The states aren't allowed to claim independence because it is against the laws. It's also tied together under a firm federal center.
