Answer:
(A) When talking to others, young children often fail to take their listeners' knowledge and perspectives into account.
Explanation:
A five-year-old is still in the process of intellectual development, so she is not yet able to identify perspectives and make logical associations, such as the fact that two people she knows but who are in different environments do not know each other, like the case of the teacher and a personal friend. Adults know this and should seek to develop these skills in children, but in a natural and healthy manner.
The Marshall Plan, also known as the European Recovery Program, was a U.S. program providing aid to Western Europe following the devastation of World War II. It was enacted in 1948 and provided more than $15 billion to help finance rebuilding efforts on the continent. The brainchild of U.S. Secretary of State George C.
Answer:
Introspection, Titchener
Explanation:
Introspection is a process through which a person looking inwards and examines one's thoughts, feelings. It a controlled and well structured and scientific way to express one's feelings thought. It is a self-observation experiment. It was first developed by William Wundt. Wundt gives training to the people and observes to analyze the content of their thoughts.
Edward Titchener is a wundt student who also utilizes this technique. In some way, he used the wundt technique in a wrong manner. Wundt was interested in showing the conscious experience of a person but Titchener was interested in breaking the mental components of a person. It is a great source of self-knowledge (introspection). Even it provides a piece of knowledge about a person which is not possible in another way.
Answer: A. designating an anti-charity should be more effective because loss aversion will provide additional motivation
.
Options:
A. designating an anti-charity should be more effective because loss
aversion will provide additional motivation
B. designating a charity should be more effective because it avoids all potential for loss
C. it shouldn’t matter whether one designates a charity or anti-charity
D. self-interest biases generally keep people from choosing the anti-charity
Explanation:
The study of behavioral Economics shows that people are more driven by the loss of fear than the hope of gain. This is known as loss aversion. In commitment contracts where penalty money is promised to a charity or an anti-charity if the goal is not achieved, those who promise their money to an anti-charity tend to achieve their goals more. The same also applies when comparing this group and those who do not have to forego anything if they do not meet their target.
This is because giving to a charity will still seem beneficial while losing the money to an anti-charity will seem like a total loss.
At age 25 your brain is developed enough to take control over your actions.
