Answer: Yes the colonist were justified in the violence towards the British because of all of the hardships and violence the British committed against the colonist. From the Stamp Act to the Townshend Act, to the Boston massacre were all things that led up to the colonist being fed up with the tyrant British king so they revolted to break away from Britian's grip.
Explanation: Hope this helps ;)
Hello there!
Here is my OPINION/ interpretation. I may or may not be incorrect.
1). The US shouldn't sell arms (weapons) overseas because it would cause a war, and the US's goal was to stay isolated, hence the term isolationism.
Arms = weapons
Arms = body part
Selling weapons across the to Britain could cause conflicts, which could lead to war.
However, (in the first image), of they didn't sell weapons, they'd remain neutral, therefore avoiding war and its costs.
2). This cartoon MAY be trying to persuade the reader that war isn't always the solution to resolving a conflict, and that isolationism can lead to peace and unity.
Again, this is MY OPINION.
Hope this helped! :)
---------------------------------
DISCLAIMER: I am not a professional tutor or have any professional background in your subject. Please do not copy my work down, as that will only make things harder for you in the long run. Take the time to really understand this, and it'll make future problems easier. I am human, and may make mistakes, despite my best efforts. Again, I possess no professional background in your subject, so anything you do with my help will be your responsibility. Thank you for reading this, and have a wonderful day/night!
Robert Alain was the first to do that. Back in 1973 he was the one who figured everything out..Basically what we have as of now
