The right choice is: A <em>whole</em> number constant could have been <em>subtracted</em> from the <em>exponential</em> expression.
Let be an <em>exponential</em> function of the form
, where
and
are <em>real</em> numbers. A <em>horizontal</em> asymptote exists when
, which occurs for
.
For this function, the <em>horizontal</em> asymptote is represented by
and to change the value of the asymptote we must add the <em>parent</em> function by another <em>real</em> number (
), that is to say:
(1)
In this case, we must use
to obtain an horizontal asymptote of -3. Thus, the right choice is: A <em>whole</em> number constant could have been <em>subtracted</em> from the <em>exponential</em> expression.
To learn more on asymptotes, we kindly invite to check this verified question: brainly.com/question/8493280
Answer: 36 whole sausages by the end of the contest.
Step-by-step explanation:
We know that he ate 27 sausages in 11 minutes, then the rate at which he ates sausages is:
R = (27 sausages)/(11 minutes) = 2.45 sausage/min
So if he ate at this rate for 15 minutes, the total number of sausages eaten by the end is:
Total number = (2.45 sausage/min)*15min = 36.8 sausages
(where we are counting again the 27 sausages that he ate in the first 11 mins)
If we only count the number of whole sausages eaten, he ate 36 whole sausages.
The answer is D. If you plug in -6 for x (the x-value where the asymptote lies), only this equation will yield 1/0 for x=6. This means that D is the correct answer.
answer will be equal to 3250 divided by 250 which is 13