Initiative vs. guilt. stage do children begin making plans and showing inventiveness in their behaviors.
What is initiative vs guilt stage?
Initiative versus guilt is the third stage of Erik Erik son's theory of psycho social development. During the initiative versus guilt stage, children assert themselves more frequently through directing play and other social interaction. These are particularly lively, rapid-developing years in a child's life.
What is Initiative According to Erikson's theory?
Psychologist Erik Erikson argues that children in early childhood go through a stage of “initiative vs. guilt”. If the child is placed in an environment where he/she can explore, make decisions, and initiate activities, they have achieved initiative
Learn more about Erikson theory:
brainly.com/question/6658212
#SPJ4
Answer:
True.
Explanation:
As per the context given in the question, she(sister) would best use this experiment of 'putting the tomatoes in sun and shade to compare the results' to persuade me as this experiment attempts to support her claim logically that establishes the credibility of her claim and compels me as an audience to accept and believe her claim. She <u>employs the 'experimental' research method to show the consequences of manipulation of an independent variable('sun') on the dependent variable 'tomatoes' to observe its impact(ripening)</u> and reach a valid and authentic conclusion. Therefore, my sister would persuade me even though she's not a scientist as this experiment substantiates her claim reasonably. Thus, the given assertion is <u>true.</u>
Answer: B -planful problem solving
Explanation:
Hylton resorts to planful problem solving to cope with an extremely stressful situation.By focusing on the various options available and creating a detailed spreadsheet for each school he can channel his anxiety in a logical manner. Rationalizing his emotion contributes to his decision. This organization helps him maintain the stress of choosing and finding his graduate school under control.
Answer:
Los partidos políticos, con el fin de lograr o recuperar la credibilidad ante los ciudadanos, deben llevar a cabo tres importantes medidas:
- Hacer promesas creíbles: a pesar de que muchos piensan lo contrario, los ciudadanos suelen reconocer cuando están siendo engañados y les están prometiendo cosas imposibles de llevar a cabo, por esta razón, es importante, que los partidos políticos solo prometan cosas que realmente pueden llevar a la práctica.
- Cumplir en la medida de lo posible esas promesas: una vez el partido político accede al poder, este debe hacer todo lo posible por cumplir las promesas de campaña. Sino lo hacen, los votantes se sentirán defraudados y la credibilidad del partido disminuirá.
- Estar conformado por personas competentes que no sean corruptas: si los miembros del partido no están capacitados, no harán su trabajo bien, y el partido perderá credibilidad. Y sobra decir que un escándalo de corrupción es quizás lo que más reduce la credibilidad de un partido frente a sus votantes.
It will be simple to keep in touch and send pertinent, interesting stuff if the database is well arranged.
The database should be organized by contact type as one of the primary methods. Marketing to the contacts is much simpler when you know who they are. One knows the drill: buyer, seller, sphere, former client, referral. There's a good likelihood that each contact will receive more than one type. Sort the contacts into groups based on the properties they currently own or intend to purchase. One can then share information with them that is pertinent to them. For instance, one will be the first to alert condo buyers when a new property hits the market that matches their preferences. Many claims that the most crucial aspect of real estate is location. It's important to consider the neighborhood, surrounding schools, walkability, and facilities.
To learn more about the database refer to:
brainly.com/question/6447559
#SPJ1
