The positive achievements of the Assyrian Empire were mostly their achievements in metalworks. The Assyrians were widely known and made important contributions to metalurgy as they were masters of iron works and producing items out of iron.
ANSWER: The Chinese society that was only known for its local tradition and martial arts became the fastest growing economy today, due to how the society became innovative and always hardworking.
EXPLANATION: The Chinese innovation in technology actually grew due to how the U.S and British invested into it's industrialization, because Chinese labor market was very cheap, and the population are also very sincere and hardworking. The U.S found this as an advantage to build it's industry at a very cheaper rate for labor, tax, land, and also government policy. It attracted so many investors to China because corruption was not high in it's government, and the citizens were sincere to foreigners and ready to work.
The Chinese were also a smart set of people that grabbed the innovation in technology and began to produce more innovative feature in the technologies that was brought to it's country. Though it's culture is still rich, but Technology has become richer that it's culture.
Answer:
John J. Pershing
Explanation:
Is well remembered for commanding the American Expeditionary Force (AEF) in Europe on the Western Front during the First World War.
Answer/ Explanation:
People of India were emerging from the status of subjects to that of citizens. The country was formed after a partition on the basis of religious differences. It was a traumatic experience for the people of India and Pakistan.
Our constitution members already know the basic needs and nature of our country. 2.Being under the British we already know the working of the political institutes. 3.In 1928, Motilal neheru and 8 other congeres members had already drafted a constitution for our nation.
This is in my opinion one of the aspects that makes the central courts and the different lines of thought within a single subject so interesting. The clash of ideas that we have in this case is a perfect example.
On one side we have those who look at the current 30 million uninsured Americans, which include millions in Texas, and the undeniable success it had in Massachusetts. Most of them conclude that this mandate is a government success.
On the other hand, we can find those who believe that this is a terrible invasion of the government to the citizen's free will to choose their own healthcare options, they see government overreach, and at the same time an unprecedented intrusion on individual liberties to which there is no justification.
Unfortunately this is something that millions of Americans have been forced into. It's evident how they refused to create a public health care system, and instead give more power to the private sector.
After this short debate of ideas, I will give you one question to ponder on: Which principle is more important? Your freedom, your civil liberties, and your freedom from the government line of thought, or the possibilty of providing health care to millions of uninsured Americans?
I hope this solves your question!
