Explanation:
Pros:
-At times they can have people released earlier
-Shorter sentences
-Less jail time
-Effective negotiating tool
-Lessens the amount of people within jails
-Removes the uncertain or unknowing factor within cases
Cons:
-People who are not guilty are pleading guilty for a crime they did not commit
-They may be manipulated by the legal system
-Removes the right to have a trial by jury
-Judges do not always have to listen or adhere to plea bargain agreements
-Can lead to bad investigatory treatment
I think that due to the legal system and the way it works, it is not inherently necessary but it is a good tool that can be used to smooth out trials, reduces the amounts of people in jail and close cases faster, so wasting less money on trials.
Answer:
The four main traditional rules are real, demonstrative, documentary, and testimonial. These laws determine what evidence must or must not be considered by the trier of fact in reaching its decision.
Explanation:
The federal rules of general provisions, judicial notice, presumptions, relevancy and its limits, privileges, witnesses, opinions and expert testimony, hearsay, authentication and identification, contents of writing, photographs and recordings. They are needed because they govern the evidence at civil and criminal trails in US federal trial courts. The current rules were initially passed by congress in 1975, after years of drafting by the Supreme courts.
illegal immigration, i mean i understand why its illigal but its not such a bad thing a lot of countries suffur and they are just seeking a new and better life you can't blame them.
Answer:
Dudly and Stephen’s murder was unecceptable, and I have no arguments. What they had done was selfish, and not even nessecary. As an attorney for the government, the two murders most certainly go to prison for a lifetime due to cannabalism.
Explanation:
