I don’t know I don’t wanna was the day I gotta was a good morning I gotta was a good day I gotta was a good day I
Answer:
the second one
Explanation:
amendment involves checking and trying to balance
Answer:
No, it is not fair to let financial pressures determine how much we are willing to spend to promote justice and public safety.
Explanation:
No, it is not appropriate to let financial pressures ascertain how much we are willing to contribute to promoting justice and public security.
Spending on justice and public safety is an essential public expense, an expense that is needed to maintain the composition of our enlightened society. Let’s consider the example of a correctional institution. Such an institution works towards the restoration of offenders. These institutions have to struggle with unlawful justice bureaus for funding. They also have to struggle with social welfare divisions like education for funding.
Now correctional bureaus help in advancing justice and public safety. If funding is freed from the restraints of financial pressures then these bureaus will be necessary for supporting public security and supporting justice.
Answer:
The British approach appears to be more effective and even more efficient.
Explanation:
The British approach eliminates the tendency of lawyers to coach the witnesses to produce required answers. This means that using the British approach, witnesses are not properly prepared with correctly rehearsed answers to questions. The discovery of the case by both lawyers happens in the courtroom and not at a pretrial stage. With the British approach, courtroom lawyers are responsible for conducting the opening statement, direct examination of witnesses, closing statement, and cross-examination of witnesses.
