Answer:they can make them not want to work anymore
Explanation:
Answer:
Laser Delivery Services, Inc. (LDS)
Analyzing the Effects of Transactions Using T-Accounts:
Cash
Date Accounts Titles Debit Credit
a. Common Stock $40,000
c. Delivery Truck $2,000
d. Delivery Truck 2,000
Balance 36,000
Common Stock
Date Accounts Titles Debit Credit
a. Cash $40,000
Land
Date Accounts Titles Debit Credit
b. Note Payable $12,000
Note Payable
Date Accounts Titles Debit Credit
b. Land $12,000
c. Delivery Truck 18,000
Balance $30,000
Delivery Trucks
Date Accounts Titles Debit Credit
c. Cash $2,000
Note Payable 18,000
d. Cash 2,000
Balance $22,000
2. Classified Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2010:
Assets:
Cash $36,000
Land 12,000
Delivery trucks 22,000 $34,000
Total assets $70,000
Liabilities + Equity:
Notes Payable 30,000
Common Stock $40,000
Total liabilities + Equity $70,000
Explanation:
a) Trial Balance
Cash $36,000
Land 12,000
Delivery trucks 22,000
Common Stock $40,000
Notes Payable 30,000
Totals $70,000 $70,000
b) Business transactions affect the accounting equation (assets = liabilities + equity) by increasing or decreasing the two sides equally. This means that the accounting equation is always in balance before and after every transaction.
Answer:
Part a: The value of Y_A and Y_B are and respectively.
Part b: Y_A and Y_B are given as and respectively for maximization of Y_B
Part c: The condition for the Pareto efficient allocation is Y_A=Y_B
As the value of Y_A and Y_B are not equal in part 2 thus the condition is not Pareto efficient
Explanation:
Part a
For the value of the utility function is given as
Also the YB is given as
So the value of Y_A and Y_B are and respectively.
Part b:
Now
For the maximization
From question 1 Y_A and Y_B are given as and respectively for maximization of Y_B
Part c:
At the Pareto efficient allocation
This is simplified to
The condition for the Pareto efficient allocation is YA=YB
As the value of YA and YB are not equal in part 2 thus the condition is not Pareto efficient
Answer:
Yield to maturity = 58.5%
Explanation:
<em>The yield to maturity on the loan can be worked out using the Future value of a lump sum formula. </em>
<em>The future value of a lump sum is the amount it would amount to if interest is earned and compounded at a certain interest rate. </em>
The formula is
FV = PV × (1+r)^(n)
PV = Present Value- 1,500
FV - Future Value, - 15,000
n- number of period- 5=
r- yield to maturity ?
15,000 = 1,500× (1+r)^(5)
(1+r)^(5) =15,000/1,500 =10
(1+r)^(5) =10
1+r = 10^(1/5)
r= 10^(1/5) -1 = 0.5848
r = 0.5848 × 100 = 58.5%
r=58.5%
Yield to maturity = 58.5%
Answer:
Option D is correct
Explanation:
The products sold by both of them have no difference in quality so price difference affects the profit on the console for any of the organisation with higher price in other words having equal price for console would maximize profit for Wal-Mart and target since demand for product is high.