1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lana66690 [7]
2 years ago
6

Was the Vietnam war winnable for America? A paragraph please

History
1 answer:
frozen [14]2 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Short answer: Yes.

Explanation:

The Vietnam War saw to the US's superior industrial, population, and military superiority, as well as the extensive usage of tactics and military industrial advantages. In fact, the Vietcong, even with the then USSR and Communist China's backing, was slowly losing grip and was losing at that point. However, the anti-war viewpoint became increasingly popular, as the reason for the US to join was inadequate at best, and the views of fighting another countries battle and seeing their own young men come home wrapped in the American flag' was unbearable to the US general public, therefore support was withdrawn. If the US continued to push after the Tet Offensive, then the US would have been able to claim the Vietnam War as a victory, rather than a strategic withdrawal, which led to the eventual demise of South Vietnam.

~

You might be interested in
73 POINTS!!<br> Help pls<br> At least 3 sentences
Mrac [35]

Answer:

Progressivism is a political philosophy in support of social reform. It is mainly based on the big idea of progress in which most advancements in science, technology, economic development, and social organization are key to the improvement of the human condition. With that said, progressivism improved Texas as in the early misdist of the first two decades of the 20th century, Texas shares the optimism and confidence that was displayed in an earlier American society. Soon, Texas would become the source of corporate power in the verge of an oil boom that would overshadow its agricultural competitor. It was solid in the Democratic Party and was well known for segregating whites from African Americans while amongst barley tolerating Mexican Americans. It had embodied the tensions and contradictions of the new south while possessing what was written as “Cooley arrogant and self sufficiency” during the twenty year period , Texas persisted in political and social reforms while riots and campaigns in woman suffrage and regulation of large companies was at large.

I am happy to help with any other questions you might have and I will continue to do my best trying to provide the brainliest answers I can. I hope this helps!

5 0
3 years ago
20 POINTS AND MARKED BRAINLIEST IF YOU ANSWER ALL CORRECTLY!
Luden [163]

2. military

3. French revolution/ political power

4.November 9th 1799

5. he first seized political power in a coup d'etat in 1799. The coup resulted in the replacement of the extant governing bodywhich is a a five-member Directory by a three-person Consulate. The first consul, Napoleon, had all the real power; the other two consuls were figureheads.

4 0
3 years ago
Explain the rational as to why people created government
nata0808 [166]

Answer:

Explanation:

Problem Solving

Identifying Basic Rights

Think of a right you believe all people should have. For example, you probably agree that everyone in the United States has the right to be protected from robbers and burglars. The belief that everyone should have this protection is shared by most people in the United States. We hear about it on television, in the newspaper, and in discussions.

Individually or in small groups, explain how you think rights like the one you have identified can be protected.

Defining "Natural Rights"

Most people in the American colonies believed that everyone had a right to life, liberty, and property. These rights were called natural rights. (Sometimes these are now called basic rights or fundamental rights.) The idea of natural rights means that all persons have these rights just because they are human beings. Everyone is born with these rights and they should not be taken away without a person's agreement.

Many of the Founders believed people receive these rights from God. Others believed that people have them just because it is natural for people to have them.

John Locke was a famous English philosopher. He lived from 1632 to 1704. He had written a book called Two Treatises of Civil Government (1690). In that book he wrote about natural rights. He said that the main purpose of government should be to protect the people's natural rights. He also said that kings should not have absolute power, that is, power without limits. They should not be able to deprive people of their natural rights.

Many Americans had read Locke's book, and they agreed with what it said about government. Those who had not actually read Locke's book knew his ideas from newspapers, political pamphlets, church sermons, and discussions.

Protecting Natural Rights

Although people agreed on certain natural rights, they worried about how those rights could be protected. Locke and others thought about what life would be like in a situation where there was no government and no laws. They called this situation a state of nature. They were afraid that in a state of nature their rights would be taken away.

Think what your classroom might be like if there were no rules.

Problem Solving

It's your turn to think like a philosopher

Imagine what life might be like in a state of nature. Think what your classroom might be like if there were no rules. Think what might happen if the teacher didn't have the right to tell anyone what to do.

Work together in groups of about five to answer the following questions about such a situation. Then choose a person to explain your answers to the rest of the class. Then compare your answers with John Locke's which follow.

What might be the advantages and disadvantages of living in a state of nature?

What might happen to people's rights?

What might life be like for everyone?

Compare Your List with John Locke's

You may have seen the same disadvantages in a state of nature that John Locke saw. Locke believed:

The stronger and smarter people might try to take away other people's lives, liberty, or property.

Weaker people might band together and take away the rights of the stronger and smarter people.

People would be unprotected and insecure.

The Social Compact

John Locke and other philosophers developed a solution to the problems that exist in a place without government. In a state of nature, people might feel free to do anything they want to do. However, their rights would not be protected and they would feel insecure.

Locke argued that people should agree with one another to give up some of their freedom in exchange for protection and security. They should consent to follow some laws in exchange for the protection that these laws would give them. This agreement is called a social compact or social contract. A social compact is an agreement people make among themselves to create a government to rule them and protect their natural rights. In this agreement the people consent to obey the laws created by that government.

In a later lesson, you will study the Declaration of Independence. You will see how the Founders included all of the ideas you have studied in this lesson in the Declaration.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why was the Tenth Amendment added to the Bill of Rights?
faltersainse [42]

Answer:

the third one

Explanation:

to lisf all the rights that belong to the states and to the people

i am sorry if this is wrong

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
1. A white Southern Dermocratin 1877 would have been most supportive of
zheka24 [161]

Answer:

Im gonna go with D

Explanation:

Southern Dermocratin wanted slaves,

Radical Reconstruction - Helped slaves

the Thirteenth, Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments. - Helped slaves

carpetbagger was a derogatory term applied by Southerners to opportunistic Northerners who came to the Southern states after the American Civil War

the compromise that made Rutherford B. Hayes president - ended the Reconstruction

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of these statements describe the goals of the Lewis and Clark Expedition?
    11·2 answers
  • 10 acontecimientos de la revolución mexicana
    11·2 answers
  • How did agriculture effect people back in the paleolithic age
    5·1 answer
  • The Stamp Act of 1765: placed taxes on any articles written on______.
    5·1 answer
  • What product nickname reflects how the South changed during the 19th century?
    15·1 answer
  • The Phoenicians were called the Purple People after one of their most famous products. What was that product and why was it impo
    14·1 answer
  • During World War II, the Indian National Congress told citizens to
    11·2 answers
  • How did the U.S. benefit from the fighting between France and England?
    8·1 answer
  • SOMEONE HELP ME PLEASE
    11·1 answer
  • What was the purpose of the Black Codes? A: to restrict the rights of formerly enslaved people B: to provide formerly enslaved p
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!