Answer:
Expensre for the year is $205
Explanation:
The cosumable equipment which offices uses regularly for professional working writing recording etc. Company holds it's inventory and record it transactions in office supplies account.
Beginning Supplies = $0
Purchases for the year = $290
Supplies at December 31 = $85
As we know
Ending Balance = Beginning Balance + Purchases - Expense for the period
$85 = $0 + $290 - Expense for the period
$85 = $290 - Expense for the period
Expense for the period = $290 - $85 = $205
Answer:
See below
Explanation:
Given the above information, we can compute variable manufacturing overhead efficiency variance to be;
= (SA - AQ) × SR
Where
Standard quantity = SQ = 19,000
Actual Quantity = AQ = 7,600
Standard Rate = SR = $1.9
Variable manufacturing overhead efficiency variance
= [(19,000 × 0.3) - 7,600] × $1.9
= (5,700 - 7,600) × $1.9
= $3,610 U
Answer: The answer is C.
Explanation: The Resource dependence theory is based on the principle that organizations, must engage in transactions with other organizations in their environment in order to acquire the resources needed for their daily operations.
Although such transactions may be advantageous, they may also create dependencies that are not, and so organization A may want to rely less on organization B, in their quest to influence the environment to make resources available.
This theory actually originated in the 1970s with the publication of The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective by Jeffrey Pfeffer and Gerald R. Salancik.
The theory is based on the idea that resources are vital for organisational success and that access and control over resources forms the basis of power.
Note:
I wasn't able to access the Chester Income Statement but I successfully accessed a similar question Digby.
The Complete Question is as under:
Refer to the HR Reports in the Inquirer. Through past investments in recruiting and training Digby has obtained a productivity index of 109.6%. This means that Digby's labor costs would be increased by 9.6% if it did not have these productivity improvements. This is a competitive advantage that Digby can sustain or even widen further if its competitors have no HR initiatives. Now, refer to the Income Statement in Digby's Annual Report. How much did Digby's productivity improvements save it in direct labor costs (in thousands) last year?
A. $766
B. $29818
C. $3137
D. $3211
Answer:
Option D. $3,137
Explanation:
The Productivity Index of 9.6% shows that if the improvement plan is implemented then the efficiency gains would result in saving of 9.6% of total direct cost. So if we total the direct cost for the year for all of the four products then we have an amount of $32,680 which is given at the second last column.
The amount saved last year would be:
Savings = $32,680 * 9.6% = $3,137
Hence the option C is correct here.
Hi,
The answer is China
Over time, China has demonstrated their support to North Korea. In 2010 North Korea attacked with artillery the island of Yeonpyeong, where there were civilians, and South Korea responded by attacking North Korea's artillery.
Tensions scaled, and although most world governments condemned the attack, China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs didn't explicitly condemn the bombarding by North Korea and only made a call to peace in the Korean Peninsula.