Answer:
In the shooting scene, you'd be able to collect the shell of the bullet and that would be one step to find out what type of gun the perpetrator used. You could go through nearby stores and look through their CCTV camera and find out what kind of car it was and maybe even catch a glimpse of the perpetrators face. However if the shooting was in a residential area you could go door to door looking for witnesses. To see if anybody heard or saw anything.
Answer:
1. we already have laws
2. banning the use of guns is unconstitutional (2nd amendment)
3. it's not the gun itself but the person behind the gun
4. gun control has been proven to be unsuccessful (look at Australia's homicide rates with various weapons)
5. banning or limiting guns restricts our access to protection against other people, corrupt government, etc
Explanation:
for #3, more ppl stop school shootings, mass murders, etc. before they happen, but they never show up on the news bc it's not a good enough story. social media and even the news nowadays is super biased, never shows all of the facts, and exaggerates things, so don't believe everything you see on the internet.
Answer:
Federal court.
Explanation:
From the question, we can see that the competitor of the company -- ABC Inc. is the plaintiff that sues its competitor for trademark infringement. ABC inc. has the right to sue its competitor in both state courts and federal court. ABC Inc. can sue the competitor in the state court if the violations of the registered trademark is only done in one state but if it is more than one states, the it will be be the case of a federal court. Furthermore, the trademark was registered Federally, ABC Inc. are definitely going to sue in a federal court.
A. A bargained - for exchange.
