Answer:
price, buyer income, the price of related goods, consumer tastes, and any consumer expectations of future supply and price.
Please Mark Brainliest If This Helped!
Answer: b. No, because the state acted as a market participant
Explanation:
The state in this instance was a market participant because they were acting as buyers who were looking for companies that could supply the service of exploiting their gas fields.
As a result, they have total discretion to pick whichever supplier they choose, regardless of the benefits or lack thereof, much like a normal buyer would do. The interstate company would therefore lose the case.
Answer:
yes and no
Explanation:
might aswell mark brainliest as well ;)
Answer:
Exemplars
Explanation:
I took the test on plato and got it right
