1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
valentina_108 [34]
3 years ago
8

Write a speech that you might deliver to colonial rulers in which you express your opinion about European imperialism in Africa.

Did you think it was a good thing or not? Why or why not? 3- 5 sentences.
History
1 answer:
labwork [276]3 years ago
5 0

Answer and Explanation:

I truly believe that European imperialism was a <u>bad thing </u>for Africans. The main goal of Europeans was to use their <u>resources</u>. During that process people were suffering and were poorly treated. Many of them died, because of miscondutment. The best example for that was Belgian Congo.

People suffered as never and were craving to change the system of government.

You might be interested in
There is a flashing yellow light at the intersection you are approaching. What does the flashing yellow light indicate, and what
Elenna [48]
Flashing yellow: 'proceed with caution'

usually to mark presense of a firestation nearby

flashing red: 'stop, then proceed'

flashing red is just a stop sign essentially
7 0
3 years ago
Thank you everyone for your answers, without yall, i prolly whould have failled my exam.
Anna11 [10]

Answer:

this is why i love brainly <3

Explanation:

happy thanksgiving

8 0
3 years ago
The most powerful Han emperor, known for his administrative centralization and imperial expansion, was
luda_lava [24]

Answer:

Emperor Wu, also known as Wudi or Liu Che.

Explanation:

Emperor Wu (141-87 BCE) expanded the influence and the power of the Chinese empire under the Han dynasty as no previous ruler had. He adopted Confucianism as the official state ideology, a decision that had profound and lasting consequences for the culture and history of China, because Confucianism continues to influence and mold Chinese mentality and social life until today, the year 2020.  He also incorporated southern China and Vietnam into his lands, and reconquered Korea. He strengthened the empires´s security by attacking and punishing the nomads Xiongnu, a permanent threat to his kingdom.

8 0
3 years ago
What kinds of food can u get from a pig?
Archy [21]

Answer:

pork,bacon,sausage,ham etc

8 0
3 years ago
Why do priests need writing??? please help asap
lora16 [44]
Here is some information to help youWhy Do Priests Need Philosophy?
DECEMBER 27, 2014 BY FR. JAMES V. SCHALL, SJ

When he (Aquinas) was not sitting, reading a book, he walked round and round the cloister, and walked fast and even furiously, a very characteristic action of men who fight their battles in the mind. (G. K. Chesterton, St. Thomas Aquinas.) 1
Here we are touching on what is the most important difference … between Christianity on the one hand, and Islam as well as Judaism on the other. For Christianity, the sacred doctrine is revealed theology; for the Jew and the Muslim, the sacred doctrine is, at least primarily, the legal interpretation of the Divine Law. The sacred doctrine in the latter sense has to say the least, much less to do with philosophy than the sacred doctrine in the former sense. It is ultimately for this reason that the status of philosophy was, as a matter of principle, much more precarious in Judaism and in Islam than in Christianity: in Christianity, philosophy became an integral part of the officially recognized and even required training of the student of the sacred doctrine. (Leo Strauss, Persecution and the Art of Writing.) 2
Over the years, I have been invited to speak at a number of seminaries—to St. Charles in Philadelphia, to Notre Dame in New Orleans, to the seminary in Bridgeport, to St. Patrick’s in Menlo Park, and I once taught at the Gregorian University in Rome. Looking back on my own studies, I have often considered the three years we spent in philosophical studies at Mt. St. Michael’s in Spokane to be the most interesting and formative ones of my many years of clerical and academic studies. In recent years, I have heard a number of professors in Catholic colleges tell me, though this is by no means universal, that much more real faith and theology exist in the philosophy department than in the theology or religious studies departments of their school. An army chaplain also told me recently that a Catholic chaplain has an advantage over the protestant chaplain who relies on scripture alone to explain everything. Very often the problem is one of reason and good sense, one that is more amenable to reason than to faith, as such. It belongs to Catholicism to respect both reason and revelation as if they belonged together, which they do.
Here I want to talk about philosophical studies for the priesthood. I take as my models Msgr. John Whipple and Msgr. Robert Sokolowski, both diocesan priests in the school of philosophy at the Catholic University of America, both good priests and fine scholars. But first I would like to recall the lecture that I gave at the Bridgeport seminary several years ago. It was later published as an appendix to my book, The Life of the Mind. The lecture was called “Reading for Clerics.” In 2011, at the Theological College at the Catholic University of America, I gave a talk, entitled “Liberal Education and the Priesthood.” It was later published in the Homiletic & Pastoral Review.3
In both of these lectures, I wanted to point out something that I learned in a most graphic way from C. S. Lewis’ book, An Experiment in Criticism.4 The philosophic enterprise begins, I suppose, when we first take seriously the admonition of the Delphic Oracle. Socrates often quoted it, namely, that we should “know ourselves.” To “know ourselves” also means taking up Socrates’ other famous admonition, in the Apology, that “the unexamined life is not worth living.” But let us suppose that we, in fact, do know and examine ourselves, clearly no mean feat, as it is so easy to deceive ourselves about ourselves. Even with a good insight into ourselves, we still would not know much, even if we were Aquinas who seemed to know just about everything. We all remember that shortly before St. Thomas died, he stopped writing. He looked at all that he had written and realized that, compared to God, all he knew was “but straw,” as he quaintly put it.
We could go two ways with this incident from Aquinas. We could decide that it was not worth the effort if, after a lifetime of study, we knew very little even about our specialties, let alone about ourselves and others. Or, as is much the better way, we could be delighted in knowing what we did learn, however minimal it might be, compared to everything out there available to be known.
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 1.Read each question and choose the best answer.
    9·1 answer
  • What understanding have archaeologists gained about the Adena and Hopewell peoples from objects found in the earthworks they lef
    9·1 answer
  • Which leader of the Scientific Revolution developed a mathematical coordinate system and emphasized the use of mathematics in al
    7·1 answer
  • Help please I need answers please
    7·1 answer
  • The value of a share in a company hardly ever changes
    6·1 answer
  • - Which of the following is true about the Puget Sound Lowlands? (1 point)
    10·1 answer
  • To combat US troops in Vietnam the viet cong
    11·1 answer
  • Who encouraged abraham lincoln to create thanksgiving day in 1863
    15·1 answer
  • What are the differences of Georgia constitution &amp; U.S constitution, amendments?
    15·1 answer
  • How many counties did Georgia have at the time of their secession from the Union?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!