Answer:
Adams was against helping in the revolution while Jefferson was for it.
Explanation:
Jefferson: Arguing that the revolution was being waged in the name of liberty for the people, Jefferson stated his position in a letter to a friend: ''My own affections have been deeply wounded by some of the martyrs to the cause, but rather than it should have failed, I would have seen half the earth desolated."
Adams: Adams was against the French Revolution. Adams was afraid that the French Revolution would destroy America. He believed the American economy and government would collapse if the country became involved in Europe’s struggle.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
First, we have to clarify something. This is not the correct statement for the question.
The correct question should be read like this: "Explain the significance of Alan Freed renaming race music as rock-and-roll music."
Now, we can comment on the following.
Alan Freed was a famous disk jockey in the 1950s, The significance of Alan Freed renaming race music as rock-and-roll music was that this change allowed him to promote this modern music in different publics, including the white youngsters that immediately fell in love to rock and roll.
What he successfully did was to take the black musicians that played rock and roll like Little Richard and Chuck Berry, to the massive white audience that had the money to buy records and buy tickets. And sell records and tickets he did, because he promoted r&r music and produced many concerts in different venues.
Answer:
Explanation:
Rwandans take history seriously. Hutu who killed Tutsi did so for many reasons, but beneath the individual motivations lay a common fear rooted in firmly held but mistaken ideas of the Rwandan past. Organizers of the genocide, who had themselves grown up with these distortions of history, skillfully exploited misconceptions about who the Tutsi were, where they had come from, and what they had done in the past. From these elements, they fueled the fear and hatred that made genocide imaginable. Abroad, the policy-makers who decided what to do—or not do—about the genocide and the journalists who reported on it often worked from ideas that were wrong and out-dated. To understand how some Rwandans could carry out a genocide and how the rest of the world could turn away from it, we must begin with history
Answer: They lived in the barracks
Explanation:
