An article about multiple brands of contact lenses, written by an independent reviewer in 2010
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
You did not provide any specif context, text, or further reference.
So we are going to answer this question in general terms.
The factors in creating a global empathic civilization would be democratic institutions that could be overseen by an international organization that truly is independently managed and could have no particular agendas not serving the economic and political interests of any powerful nation.
Another factor could be that citizens from the rich country could live for a period of time in poor nations so they can learn what is to live in shortage of food, lack of services, insecurity, bad transportation services, so they can be more conscious of what they have, more responsible with the use of resources, stop consumerism, and would really help those nations that are struggling to survive on a daily basis.
By the way, there is a novel titled "The Empathic Civilization," written by American author Jeremy Rifkin in 2010. He is an economist that wrote a fictional book to invite people to reflect on how technological advances had influenced the development of humans in the modern world.
Maybe, you could be interested in reading it.
This poem written by Marianne Moore has had several versions written by the author herself, given her desire on being clear and precise. The first version of this poem appeared in 1919 and it comprised 30 lines, which then she cut down to 13 in 1925. Then, finally, in 1967, she published a final version that was cut down to only 4 lines. A lot of criticism has been given to this poem as it seems at first that the poet is literally saying that she dislikes poetry. However, this comes because the last version of the poem does not give the reader a glimpse into what the author means really and whether she truly dislikes all poetry or not. However, after much studying it is discovered that what Moore is saying is not that she dislikes all poetry, but only the type that has given precedence to intelligence over imagination and therefore becomes so convoluted that people are incapable of understanding it. She, in turn, defends the type that she considers good and acceptable poetry and she defines it as the one where the imagination overcomes the intelligence and the abstract and allows the reader to almost feel what the author is trying to convey. This can be seen in this particular excerpt from the line that says thus: "nor till the poets among us can be "literalists of the imagination" - above insolence and triviality and can present for inspection, "imaginary gardens with real toads in them," shall we have it."
