1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
IRISSAK [1]
3 years ago
15

I'd greatly like some help if anybody knows shakespeare.

English
1 answer:
shusha [124]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

(i'm using option 1, "i'll beat thee, but i would infect my hands"

Explanation:

in modern tongue, this insult roughly means that the person being spoken to is so disgusting that he/she is not even worth beating up because you would get sick from touching him/her. when timon says this to apemantus, they are in a nasty brawl. although possibly seen as medieval, this insult could easily be used in modern arguments given shakespeare's witful wordplay.

You might be interested in
Why is the ending of "charles" ironic
zysi [14]
Laurie was misbehaving at home. Jackson learned that there was in fact no Charles and that Laurie had been the one pulling the pranks that he blamed on "Charles" 
5 0
3 years ago
At the time Freeman wrote "The Revolt of 'Mother'" women's role in society was very different from that of today. In an essay of
aleksandr82 [10.1K]

In "The Revolt of Mother" Freeman described women's role in the 19th century, when women were the only ones responsible for the household chores and for raising the children. In fact, these were the only things they were supposed to be occupied with as they wouldn't go to school like boys nor would they find a job. Freeman also describes the position of the mother in the family, where she couldn't participate in decision-making which concerned the house and the family including her. All important decisions were taken by the husband and even if the wife disagreed she couldn't do anything about it.

Today, in the Western world, women have gained the right to education and to equal opportunities in employment. Their role in the family has also changed as today the father participates in the household chores as well and he is also responsible for bringing up the children. Nowadays, the women can take important decisions concerning their lives and their families.

However, there some remnants from that era that are still with us today. For example, even if women have gained the right to vote there are still less women in the Parliaments than men. In addition to this, there are plenty of jobs in which they prefer to hire men or where women and men are not equally paid.  Last but not least, many people still believe that women should have a different role in the family than men.

In conclusion, although the position of women has improved a lot since the era of Freeman, there are still many issues to be resolved.  

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
what is a funny basketball catchphrase that means let's go? please help its for an essay also please make sure its not something
Semmy [17]
A good catchphrase is “putting ‘em on skates”. This means if u dribble past someone or do a nice move that breaks someone’s ankles or makes them move a bit you could say that. Have a good day
4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the author’s viewpoint in the excerpt?
Lapatulllka [165]

Answer: The author appreciates Diane’s concern for the well-being of the tiger.

Explanation:

The author’s viewpoint in the excerpt is that "The author appreciates Diane’s concern for the well-being of the tiger".

From the excerpt, we can read that Diane wasn’t concerned about her safety but rather she was worried as she didn't want to harm the tiger as she felt for the well being of the tiger and didn't want to cast the body part of the living animal.

7 0
2 years ago
Jones is a reporter for Channel 10. Jones interviews Kennedy about a group that robs elderly people’s houses in the community. J
Helen [10]

Answer:

- Win because the U.S. Supreme Court and other courts have said the First Amendment does not protect reporters who break confidentiality promises.

Explanation:

As per the given description, Kennedy will 'win because the U.S. Supreme Court and other courts have said the First Amendment does not protect reporters who break confidentiality promises.' According to the laws, Jones is not allowed to reveal the confidential information of Kennedy. Since she broke this law of privacy and the promise she made to Kennedy, Kennedy is legally eligible and justifiable for suing Jones and winning the case.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • With which of these Canterbury tales character does Chaucer illustrate a division between religious and scientific thought
    6·1 answer
  • What is “nougat”? You’ve seen the ads on television. A voice entices you with words like “rich milk chocolate” and “fresh, crunc
    12·2 answers
  • Why should Education Should Be Free for Everyone
    9·2 answers
  • Confiding a secret to an unworthy person is like carrying grain in a bag with a hole?
    8·1 answer
  • How does environment contribute communication positive or negative?
    11·1 answer
  • We use information from which two sources in order to determine whether an author uses a word or phrase differently than we use
    13·1 answer
  • Can anyone help me with this question!!
    11·1 answer
  • SOMEONE PLZ HELPP
    7·2 answers
  • What type of sentence is this?
    6·2 answers
  • Thomas mother pulled him out of school because_________________. (Please help meeeeeeeeee)
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!