1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
k0ka [10]
3 years ago
7

Compare the differences in evaporation and precipitation over Earth's oceans and land. How are

History
1 answer:
Irina-Kira [14]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:Evaporation is more prevalent over the oceans than precipitation, while over the land, precipitation routinely exceeds evaporation. Most of the water that evaporates from the oceans falls back into the oceans as precipitation.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Why did the us want to purchase California from Mexico
Hoochie [10]

Answer: to expand territory

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
What is a horse but is named after a car
irinina [24]
A mustang is a kind of horse and a kind of car
3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Details.<br> 1.<br> Discuss the criticisms of the name Tuskegee Syphilis Study.
KATRIN_1 [288]
The Tuskegee Study of Untreated Syphilis in the African American Male is the longest nontherapeutic experiment on human beings in medical history, as noted by Arthur L. Caplan (1992). Begun in 1932 by the United States Public Health Service (USPHS), the study was purportedly designed to determine the natural course of untreated latent syphilis in some 400 African American men in Tuskegee, Macon County, Alabama. The research subjects, all of whom had syphilis when they were enrolled in the study-contrary to the “urban myth” that holds “black men in Alabama were injected with the virus that causes syphilis” (Walker, 1992)-were matched against 200 uninfected subjects who served as a control group.

The subjects were recruited with misleading promises of “special free treatment,” which were actually spinal taps done without anesthesia to study the neurological effects of syphilis, and they were enrolled without their informed consent.

The subjects received heavy metals therapy, standard treatment in 1932, but were denied antibiotic therapy when it became clear in the 1940s that penicillin was a safe and effective treatment for the disease. When penicillin became widely available by the early 1950s as the preferred treatment for syphilis, this therapy was again withheld. On several occasions, the USPHS actually sought to prevent treatment.

The first published report of the study appeared in 1936, with subsequent papers issued every four to six years until the early 1970s. In l969, a committee at the federally operated Center for Disease Control decided the study should continue. Only in 1972, when accounts of the study first appeared in the national press, did the Department of Health, Education and Welfare (HEW) halt the experiment.

At that time, 74 of the test subjects were still alive; at least 28, but perhaps more than 100, had died directly from advanced syphilis. An investigatory panel appointed by HEW in August 1972 found the study “ethically unjustified” and argued that penicillin should have been provided to the men. As a result, the National Research Act, passed in 1974, mandated that all federally funded proposed research with human subjects be approved by an institutional review board (IRB). By 1992, final payments of approximately $40,000 were made to survivors under an agreement settling the class action lawsuit brought on behalf of the Tuskegee Study subjects. President Clinton publicly apologized on behalf of the federal government to the handful of study survivors in April 1997.

Several major ethical issues involving human research subjects need to be studied further. The first major ethical issue to be considered is informed consent, which refers to telling potential research participants about all aspects of the research that might reasonably influence their decision to participate. A major unresolved concern is exactly how far researchers’ obligations extend to research subjects. Another concern has to do with the possibility that a person might feel pressured to agree or might not understand precisely what he or she is agreeing to. The investigators took advantage of a deprived socioeconomic situation in which the participants had experienced low levels of care. The contacts were with doctors and nurses who were seen as authority figures.
4 0
2 years ago
What 1819 event made Americans want to elect officials who better protected their interests
QveST [7]
The panic of 1819 I believe because it was a financial crisis
4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following is not a commonly accepted theory on how the first humans arrived in Japan?
aliya0001 [1]

Answer: B

Explanation: A is wrong because the ice age was about 2.4 mil years ago and not many survived

C is wrong because i didnt find proof on that

D is wrong because the wrong island

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why was the Seneca Falls Convention important?
    10·1 answer
  • Why did the United States fight Britain and NOT France in the War of 1812? Loyalties in America were strongly tied to France. To
    5·2 answers
  • How did 100 men defeat over 400 mexicans at the battle of Concepción
    14·1 answer
  • I need to right an essay on Mongul
    10·1 answer
  • Which two types of characters are usually least important to the story? antagonist and protagonist antagonist and flat character
    6·2 answers
  • I too am not a bit tamed i too am untranslatable which of these poetic devices does he use here.
    12·2 answers
  • How long did Armstrong spend on the lunar surface​
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following was TRUE about the Black Death but UNKOWN by the people at the time?
    6·2 answers
  • Help please it's american history​
    6·1 answer
  • I need help with questions in my history class
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!