The logical connection is absent. The answer lacks any explanation to the question being made. The main problem is that the interviewer is left with a very incomplete response, one that requires a lot of work from part of the interviewer. In this case in particular, even if there were a connection between reducing rates and unemployment, it seems that the candidate does not really have an answer to the question. That is why the fallacy is the lack of connection or relevance between the question and the answer
The correct answer for the question that is being presented above is this one: "True." Madame Loisel was born to a lower-class family. This is true.
The correct answer for the question that is being presented above is this one: "worked terribly hard to pay off the borrowed money." The Loisels worked terribly hard to pay off the borrowed money <span>during the ten years following the ball.</span>
Answer:
Uncle Pytor probaly had a really bad experience on the jouney to his new home. How he differs from the immigrants is that his journey may of been more painful and more dangerous.
Explanation:
Answer:
19. The restaurant could get reported and go out of business
The only one i can give you is 19 u gotta give more information if its there like the paragraph or the picture lemme know if theres a paragraph or sum and i can give u the rest of the answers
Explanation:
