Answer: im going to give you my analysis on this. im pretty sure first you have to put the important stuff on top. then in the middle you put some stuff to expand on the first thing. then you add some extra stuff.
Explanation: a-boom
That is a sentence fragment
Answer: Chad will make a good class president
Explanation:
The most warrant statement is that Chad will be a good class president because of his chess skills that are good for that and that can help him. Chess skills and that he is a chess player are giving him authorization for being a class president. This statement can also be false.
Answer:
Credible evidence
Explanation:
Eyewitness accounts – this is not the right answer. There is actually no eyewitness in that specific sense of the word when it comes to literal work.
Personal narrative – this is not correct. The analysis is a scientific method and it should not use personal accounts. Therefore, the personal narrative is not the analysis.
<u> Credible evidence – this is the correct answer.</u> <u>When trying to do the literal analysis one should use as objective facts as possible.</u> This means they should note facts, <u>such as the name of the author, the name of the work, publisher, etc. </u>All these are credible evidence that can be easily confirmed and which are objective.
Alternate ending – this is not the right answer. The point of the analysis is not to change the narrative or speculate, so an alternative ending should not be included.
Answer:
Tyler joking that they live in a penthouse apartment
Hope it helps PLS MARK ME AS BRAINLIST I BEG YOU pleaseeee
