United States and European privacy laws are largely based on the Fair information practices report.
The Fair Information Practices, additionally referred to as the Fair Information Practice Principles (FIPPs), are a set of 8 concepts concerning facts usage, collection, and privacy. They had been posted in 1980 through the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) and a number of countries agreed upon them in principle.
The FIPPs as they presently seem are primarily based totally on recommendations proposed through an advisory committee to the United States Department of Health, Education, and Welfare in 1973. The committee's document referred to that "Safeguards for personal privacy primarily based totally on our idea of mutuality in record-keeping could require adherence through record-retaining groups to certain fundamental concepts of fair records practice.
To know more about Fair Information Practices refer:
brainly.com/question/15685630
#SPJ4
This is incorrect. There is no mention of democracy anywhere in the declaration of independence. The ideas of democracy are implied because explanations about life and liberty are democratic as well as the unalienable human rights part. The declaration is more about getting away from the tyrannical king than it is about establishing democratic principles. That's what the constitution was for.
Answer:
Number 1 and 2 are correct. Number 3 is "yes". Number 4 is "yes". Number 5 is "no". Number 6 is "no". Number 7 is "yes". Number 8 is "no".
Explanation:
Number one isn't fair because the juvenile wouldn't know what to say and would be confused about what's happening or going to happen because they didn't have enough time to prepare. Number 2 isn't fair because she might say something that she didn't know she was/wasn't supposed to say that the lawyer would have told her. Number 3 is fair because they aren't supposed to lie in court and the judge needs to know what happened to know how much trouble the person gets and who gets it. Number 4 is fair because since the person is underage and doesn't have enough money to buy a lawyer, the court should assign one to the juvenile. Number 5 is no because the judge or the person going against the juvenile could say something that never happened or never been said at the hearing. Number 6 is no because there's nothing against the juvenile about what happened and he/she could be innocent. Number 7 is yes because the court needs all the evidence and proof about what happened so the judge knows what to do. Number 8 is no because the parents might not be able to make it because they might forget the date of the hearing and they need writing for when the date is and where the hearing is, incase they forgot. I really hope i helped.
Answer:
Framers of the US Constitution:)
