1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
marin [14]
3 years ago
7

What happened after Europeans arrive in North America in the 1600s

History
1 answer:
Nady [450]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The European presence in America spurred countless changes in the environment, setting into motion chains of events that affected native animals as well as people. ... With their loss came the loss of beaver ponds, which had served as habitats for fish as well as water sources for deer, moose, and other animals.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Why did agriculture suffer serious problems in the roman empire​
jenyasd209 [6]

Answer:

Roman Agriculture describes the farming practices of ancient Rome, during a period of over 1000 years. From humble beginnings, the Roman Republic (509 BCE to 27 BCE) and empire (27 BCE to 476 CE) expanded to rule much of Europe, northern Africa, and the Middle East and thus comprised many agricultural environments of which the Mediterranean climate of dry, hot summers and cool, rainy winters was the most common. Within the Mediterranean area, a triad of crops was most important: grains, olives, and grapes.

The great majority of the people ruled by Rome were engaged in agriculture. From a beginning of small, largely self-sufficient landowners, rural society became dominated by latifundium, large estates owned by the wealthy and utilizing mostly slave labor. The growth in the urban population, especially of the city of Rome, required the development of commercial markets and long-distance trade in agricultural products, especially grain, to supply the people in the cities with food.

7 0
3 years ago
Complete the following paragraph by selecting the correct answer from each drop-down menu. The South tried to justify the by arg
AlladinOne [14]

Based on historical perspective, the South tried to justify the "<u>Chàttel Slàvery</u> by arguing that keeping slavery was a matter of states' rights, but the South also favored <u>Fúgitive Slàve Law</u> which took away Northern States' rights to protect enslaved people who had escaped to the North.

<h3>What is Chàttel Slàve?</h3>

The chàttel slàve is the form of slavery arrangement whereby an individual has the ownership of another man to work for him as he pleases, either at home or in fields.

During the debate on the abolition of slàvery between North and South, the Southern States argued that chàttel slàvery is no different than wage slàvery, and it should be the state's right to determine whether to be a slàve state or free state.

Again, during the debate, the south argued in favor of the <u>Fugitivé Slàve Law.</u> This law mandated Northerners to turn escaped slàves who moved to the North back over to their Southern owners, though it was against their rights to protect enslaved people.

Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is Chàttel Slàvery and Fugitíve Slàve Law accordingly.

Learn more about the Fugítive Slàve Law here: brainly.com/question/9505313

6 0
3 years ago
Which of the following best describes the work performed by enslaved<br> people in South Carolina? *
algol [13]

Answer: what are the choices??

5 0
3 years ago
Which british explorer named many landforms in the puget sound
mote1985 [20]
I think it's George Vancouver?

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Names of areas under British control in the 1800s
Darya [45]

Answer:

hope it is use full to you

Explanation:

       The main sources used for this guide are T. O. Lloyd, The British Empire 1558-1983 (Oxford, 1984) and John Stewart, The British Empire: An Encyclopedia of the Crown's Holdings, 1493 through 1995 (London, 1996). I have cross-referenced the information in these two books with a number of other sources to ensure accuracy. For more information, users might consult the following:

 

C A. Bayley, ed., Atlas of the British Empire. (New York, 1989)

U. J. Marshall, ed., The Cambridge Illustrated History of the British Empire. (Cambridge, 1996)

J Holland, ed. The Cambridge History of the British Empire. (Cambridge, 1929-1963)

James Olson and Robert Shadle, ed., Historical Dictionary of the British Empire. (Westport, 1996)

Foundations of Modern Britain series:

Alan G. R. Smith, The Emergence of a Nation State. The Commonwealth of England, 1529-1660. (Longman, 1984)

Geoffrey Holmes, The Making of a Great Power. Late Stuart and Early Georgian Britain 1660-1722. (Longman, 1993)

Geoffrey Holmes and Daniel Szechi, The Age of Oligarchy. Pre-Industrial Britain 1722-1783. (Longman, 1993)

Eric Evans, The Forging of the Modern State. Early Industrial Britain 1783-1870. (Longmand, 1983)

Keith Robins, The Eclipse of a Great Power. Modern Britain 1870-1975. (Longman, 1983)

The British Empire was composed of the dominions, colonies, protectorates, mandates, and other territories ruled or administered by the United Kingdom and its predecessor states. It began with the overseas possessions and trading posts established by England between the late 16th and early 18th centuries. At its height it was the largest empire in history and, for over a century, was the foremost global power.[1] By 1913 the British Empire held sway over 412 million people, 23% of the world population at the time,[2] and by 1925 it covered 35,000,000 km2 (13,500,000 s q mi),[3] 24% of the Earth's total land area. As a result, its constitutional, legal, linguistic, and cultural legacy is widespread. At the peak of its power, it was described as "the empire on which the sun never sets", as the sun was always shining on at least one of its territories.[4]

During the Age of Discovery in the 15th and 16th centuries, Portugal and Spain pioneered European exploration of the globe, and in the process established large overseas empires. Envious of the great wealth these empires generated,[5] England, France, and the Netherlands began to establish colonies and trade networks of their own in the Americas and Asia. A series of wars in the 17th and 18th centuries with the Netherlands and France left England (Britain, following the 1707 Act of Union with Scotland) the dominant colonial power in North America. Britain became the dominant power in the Indian subcontinent after the East India Company's conquest of Mughal Bengal at the Battle of Plassey in 1757.

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is another name for a map key?
    6·2 answers
  • Review the term.
    6·2 answers
  • What is the answer to The Supreme Court limits the powers of Congress by
    10·1 answer
  • What was the main purpose of the Indian Removal Act of 1830?
    15·2 answers
  • A little help please!
    7·2 answers
  • What was a result of the changing population in New England between 1620 and 1690?
    14·1 answer
  • Which statement best describes the southern colonies
    13·1 answer
  • Which dynasty required tribute from other territories?<br> Sui<br> Song<br> Han<br> Tang
    12·1 answer
  • A military company is_____.
    5·2 answers
  • How was the American Southeast different from the North when it came to Native American populations?
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!