1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Varvara68 [4.7K]
3 years ago
12

How did the Supreme Court case, Gibbons v. Ogden, affect interstate commerce?

Social Studies
2 answers:
kenny6666 [7]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

A: it determined that the only the federal government could regulate interstate commerce

Explanation:

Dmitry_Shevchenko [17]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

the answer is a

Explanation:

You might be interested in
If columbus did so many bad things why do you think people still respect him
Furkat [3]

Answer:

because the bad things have been pushed under the rug and the so called good things are more focused on.

Explanation:

8 0
4 years ago
In a conversation with a coworker, you're not sure what she said about the Clearwater building site. By repeating what you think
Charra [1.4K]
You're demonstrating effective listening skills

listening skills are skills to listen well and understand well what people are saying, and you can demonstrate them by repeating in your words what was said: this shows you understood what was said, since  you couldn't do it without properly understanding him
4 0
4 years ago
Which of the following was not an Allied Power?
Phoenix [80]
Italy was not an allied power rather it was an axis power as it was a fascist state
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How has the manufacturing and distribution of condoms reflected the larger goals of corporate capitalism?
seraphim [82]

Answer:

Explanation:

There are several things that they did, such as

-- Building missios and pessidios within the region

- Handlig the Anglo immigrants to the region by promising them with new prospect of natural resources

- Sending troops to handle the east texas region as an effort to prevent Mexico's intention from gaining their own independence from the Spnish.

3 0
4 years ago
Define the opening arguments and process of a Supreme Court case hearing
gogolik [260]

According to the Constitution, the SCOTUS has both appellate and original jurisdiction. Original jurisdiction means cases that are heard for the first time in the Supreme Court. These are usually high ranking cases that involve disputes between states or between high ranking officials.

Appellate cases make up the majority of cases heard by the SCOTUS. These are cases that have been heard before by lowers courts throughout the country. Unsatisfied parties with a lower court judgment submit a petition to the SCOTUS, called Writ of Certiorari. The SCOTUS then has all the files from the lower court case sent to it for examination. Four of the nine Justices must accept to hear a case for it to be heard by the SCOTUS. If the Justices accept the case, it is placed on the docket of cases to hear. The petitioner is granted a certain amount of time to write his brief on the case (no more than 50 pages). The opposite party, called the respondent, also has some time to submit its 50 pages brief.

After this initial process, both parties respond to each other’s brief with a shorter brief. The SCOTUS may also grant permissions to groups that are not directly involved in the legal dispute to provide their own file with recommendations and arguments in favor of the side they support. Such brief is called amicus curiae (friend of the Court, in Latin). The SCOTUS hears the oral arguments for both parties sometime between October and April. These proceedings are open to the public and usually start at 10am. Each hearing lasts an hour and each party has 30 minutes to present its argument. The hearing is interrogative (Justices ask questions to each party about their position). Petitioners speak first and respondents follow suit. If petitioners have saved time for a rebuttal, they will be the last to speak.

The Justices meet twice every week to review the cases and vote on a decision. This meeting is called the Justices’ Conference. After the result of the vote is available, any dissenting Justices may write a dissenting opinion on the final decision. If they vote ends up in a tie (because one of the Justices is unavailable), the lower court’s decision stands. In very rare occasions, a majority opinion may be changed if a Justice reverses his/her vote. It is only when opinions are disclosed in public open court hearings that they are official and final.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How do anthropologists use the absolute dating technique to study pre history
    14·1 answer
  • If you see double solid lines on a two-lane roadways you should know that
    13·2 answers
  • Who is Harriet tubman
    9·1 answer
  • A research project sets out to use large amounts of objective data to describe the rates and averages of several characteristics
    14·1 answer
  • Which one of the following terms best describes the period of the 1920s?
    5·1 answer
  • Max Weber's theories are often considered to be the main foundation for the later development of the Symbolic Interactionist par
    12·1 answer
  • Clear-cutting limits the extent to which forests are renewable because __________.
    10·2 answers
  • Which describes Australia's literacy rate and standard of
    6·1 answer
  • Describe three major problems faced by landlocked countries?
    6·1 answer
  • What happens if aggregate is tied in champions league.
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!