The growth of industries in America started in the earlier 1800s and continued all through to the civil wars. After the war was over, the industries in America had become small, and labor remained widely but limited the production of more products.
Many businesses operated in small companies because lacked enough capital to expand. The American industry changed drastically after the war due to the introduction of machines that replaced manual labor, thus increase production. Investors also improved and expanded their operations.
Answer:
Nehru's attack on Goa would weaken capitalist forces worldwide, facilitating the spread of communism. This hindered the policy advocated by Kennedy.
Explanation:
Nehru was the prime minister of India and in addition to having to defend the country from the communist threat that was growing because of China and Russia, he had to defend the country from European colonialism.
The Goa region, in Inida, was still dominated and occupied by the Portuguese, forcing Nehru to order an attack to be made in that region, so that the Portuguese could be expelled. President Kennedy saw this as a major threat to capitalist forces, as Portuguese was a capitalist ally and India too. If a capitalist country provoked another capitalist country, it would make capitalism seen as a weak policy and incapable of promoting peace. This would allow communism to move forward with great force.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
You forgot to include the choices of the questions. Without the choices, we do not have references. However, hope we can help with the following comments.
Jus ad bellum is the kind of legislation that authorizes the transition from a state of peace and agreement to a state of war, where the use of the armed forces is justified. It implies that just a legitimate authority can wage war when no other option is left. Just ad bellum have some principles, that include: right authority, right intention, proportionality, reasonable hope, and last intention, which can be understood as the case in which war is the last resource after a long period of diplomacy and negotiation, under the right authority and the valid reasons to proceed as the last resource to solve an issue.
Mm believe the answer is <span>John Thoreau
I hope i helped and let me know :)
havee a great day and please mark brainliest</span>
