I'd assume that the answer is Career Fair from past experience. I hope this helps!
With his parents, Joel was employing the door-in-the-face compliance technique.
A compliance tactic that is frequently researched in social psychology is the door-in-the-face approach. The persuader makes a sizable request that the respondent will probably reject in an effort to get them to agree, kind of like metaphorically slamming a door in the persuader's face.
In the door-in-the-face method, compliance is improved by making an incredibly difficult request first, followed by a target request that is genuinely wanted.
An illustration of this would be if you refused a friend's request to borrow an excessive amount of money, only for them to later ask for a lower amount and receive your approval. The door-in-the-face tactic is frequently employed to get individuals to make a financial contribution.
To learn more about door-in-the-face technique
brainly.com/question/29380131
#SPJ4
Answer:
HI your question is incomplete attached to the answer is an image of the complete question
i) MSG
II) OVER
III) MSE
IV) UNBIASED
Explanation:
MSG ( ) : this is calculated by taking the sample variance of the sample distribution of the mean for every group involved with the test and it unbiased under the null hypothesis alone
while MSE is gotten from using the sample mean of the sample variances of each group involved with the test and it is always unbiased whether or not there is a population / treatment effect
<u>Pat</u><u>, because of the effects of </u><u>effort justification.</u>
<h3><u>What is justification for effort?</u></h3>
The tendency for people to rate a task or activity higher when it involves anything challenging or unpleasant. When there are no evident justifications for performing the task, the outcome is most likely to happen. Because exerting effort to complete pointless or unpleasant work, or suffering unpleasant consequences, as a result, is cognitively inconsistent (see cognitive dissonance), it is hypothesized that people will change their assessments of the task to be more positive in order to restore consistency.
Learn more about effort justification with the help of the given link:
brainly.com/question/14354875?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ4
Answer:
It is nobler to die with integrity than to live with compromised principles
Explanation:
it is nobler to die with integrity then to live with principles that harm other strongly support the statement that men with integrity does not compromise with his principles he is self made person and he believes in his abilities and work on his own principles on the other side a man who compromises on his principles usually lacks confidence and is not capable enough to believe on his own abilities and is not able to make decisions on his own on the other side a man with integrity confidence is capable enough to even handle difficult of situation and can manage every problem very well as this phrase is mostly quoted in most of the texts
REBECCA NURSE a famous religious author also quoted as same that "It is nobler to die with integrity than to live with compromised principles that harm others" being a religious and follower of GOD she came on to the conclusion that in living with integrity is that what matters
