Evidence that can be used to modify or refute what Stannard said about Columbus would be (D) examples of long-term benefits for people in Europe and Asia that resulted from the voyages by Columbus.
<h3>What did Stannard think of Columbus?</h3>
David Stannard thinks very lowly of Christopher Columbus as a result of the latter's crimes in North America which included the killing and mutilating of Native Americans.
David Stannard believed that the exploration of the Americas brought only long-term pain to Native Americans so a view that would refute this would have to show descriptions that Native Americans enjoyed some long term benefits thanks to Columbus.
Find out more on Christopher Columbus at brainly.com/question/15581111
#SPJ1
It affected women in the U.S because of how they were only there at home when usually their husbands were out fighting for the war. This provided more job opportunities for women and caused them to be the "head of the house".
Answer:
Bureaucracy used to be a good thing for China prospered but by the end it became corrupt, or dishonest, relatives and servants of the emperor had seized control of the government. - High taxes sent many families into poverty etc. Hope this helps :)
Explanation:
Answer:
Probably scoff at it briefly then go back to trying to survive in the absolute terrible working conditions, probably get my arms torn off by the old extremely dangerous machinery.
(obviously this is my personal answer, I'm not going to look it up)
