1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ymorist [56]
3 years ago
8

Bentham and Kant agree on which of the following?

Law
1 answer:
timurjin [86]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

In fact, Bentham would first take into account the consequences of all acts to determine whether each action induces pleasure or suffering, while Kant would consider perform the act & decide whether this action is moral "right" or "wrong." The theory of Bentham only recognises the best possible happiness induced.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
An attorney who wishes to exclude a juror because of a predjudice makes a
Bingel [31]

Answer:

challenge for cause is the answer.

7 0
3 years ago
What are the qualifications for everyone that trump has hired for the us department of agriculture?
vivado [14]

Answer:

Shrek is my favorite anime

Explanation: because

3 0
3 years ago
Groups such as the Plug Uglies, the Swamp Angels, the Daybreak Boys, and the Bowery Boys are associated with
pishuonlain [190]

Answer:

pre-twentieth-century, East Coast, urban gangs in the United States

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
In what situations would a defendant be wise to take a plea deal? Why do you think a prosecutor want to make a plea bargain offe
Maksim231197 [3]

Answer:

If they feel like they are going to get out in prison or if they think that they are about to be proven guilty. they may make a plea deal so they can get the defendants help if they know something the prosecutor needs to know for the case.

4 0
3 years ago
What was the supreme court's main decision in Palko v. Connecticut?
Sveta_85 [38]

Answer:

Search Results

Featured snippet from the web

Supreme Court decision presiding that the Fourth Amendment's defense in contradiction of unreasonable explorations and appropriations must be prolonged to the states in addition to the federal government. This upturned Polka v Connecticut, asserting that defense from double jeopardy does relate in state courts.

Explanation: the court looked at the fourteenth amendment to make their decision and looks like they could`t decide

3 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • What type of document do you need for an appeal?​
    9·1 answer
  • Any ideas about the 9-11
    13·2 answers
  • When a company goes public, it begins doing what?
    13·1 answer
  • I beg u to help me pleas dont just take the pints
    8·1 answer
  • Hi Dahlia! How are you. for those who give me dumb answers will get reported and if you are a P E D O P H I L E! How many letter
    10·1 answer
  • Which of these is an example of the exchange principle?
    8·2 answers
  • Guys what’s jay walking is it like the moonwalk
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following is a risk involved in both sales and leases?
    8·1 answer
  • What are some of the circumstances that might make a primary source "unreliable" or at least unsuitable to stand alone when exam
    14·1 answer
  • Is this statement true or false? the 14th amendment weakened the power of the states. It gave the federal government the power t
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!