1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kolbaska11 [484]
3 years ago
13

A few years ago, Bill became a victim of identity theft. Recently, Bill received a corrected credit clearance from Indent Credit

Reporting Services. Indent accurately cleared Bill’s credit records of the harmful credit originating from the identity theft. The theft originated due to their incorrect maintenance of information collection procedures. Which federal law protected Bill’s consumer rights?
Law
1 answer:
slavikrds [6]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Fair Credit Reporting Act

Explanation:

You might be interested in
What did the party claiming religious freedom argue in Welsh vs United States ?
VLD [36.1K]
Supreme Court: Traditional religious belief not necessary for conscientious objector status. ... The Court ruled 6-3 that his beliefs were sufficiently religious such that he was entitled to CO status. Justice Hugo L. Black authored an opinion for four justices interpreting the Selective Service Act.
8 0
2 years ago
Shirley and Bob are married, receive Social Security benefits and file a joint tax return. What is the base amount with which ½
NISA [10]

answer:

sorry i don't know the answer of these question ok but merry christmas to you ok having fun  and happy new year.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The state in which a defendant has been sentenced by a court after having either pled guilty or been found guilty by a judge or
kobusy [5.1K]
The state in which a defendant has been sentenced by a court after having either pleaded guilty or been found guilty by a judge or jury. Being adjudicated is equivalent to a conviction.
7 0
2 years ago
Law in Society
Debora [2.8K]

Answer:

option d makes sense to this question

3 0
2 years ago
In 1996 California legalized the medical use of marijuana, even though it was still illegal under federal law. Californians Ange
BartSMP [9]

Answer:

The federal government's argument must prevail.

Explanation:

The medical marijuana of Angel Raich and Diane Monson really affects the interstate marijuana market and interferes with government control of that product. In this case, the federal government has the authority to regulate and prohibit the consumption and sale of this product. In this case, the action of justice in destroying the factories of Angel and Diane was correct, and it is not up to them to open a case in their defenses.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The process of deciding a court case based on the basis of previous decisions is the principle of which of the following?
    12·2 answers
  • Why were the Articles of Confederation an unrealistic plan of government
    15·1 answer
  • What would happen if you fake a credit card number online on a website.
    11·1 answer
  • In the context of types of corruption in police departments, which of the following
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following types of government would be most likely to hold free and fair elections to
    6·2 answers
  • What are examples of procedural laws?
    15·1 answer
  • Why did the professional field of paralegals develop?
    10·2 answers
  • Relationship between legislation and case law​
    14·2 answers
  • I am more of a question answerer, soooooo FREEEEEEE POOOOIIIINTSSSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    8·2 answers
  • What is the county government's role?.
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!