Answer:
Porosity
Explanation:
Something that is permeable allows liquid or air to pass through it
Non Porous means doesn't allow liquid or air to pass through it, porosity is the opposite of this and allows liquid or air to pass through it.
Answer:
PS I Love You
Mamma Mia (1 &2)
The Phantom of the Opera
I Am Legend
Olympus Has Fallen
A Family Man (The Headhunter's Calling)
One More Kiss
Pride and Prejudice
Explanation:
Answer:
a)The image relates to the sino-japanese war which was a dispute between the Qing dynasty and Japanese Empire over influence in Joseon Korea. So this image depicts what was happening in the western pacific during the late 19th century which was a ideology called imperialism. This was occurring because countries wanted to expand there control economically and politically over other regions typically surrounding ones.
b)The image depicted shows how countries wanted to expand there control over other regions and use there resources to better there own economy. One example of this is when countries began sending people to the Americas to use its resources for the better of their own countries.
c)The image shows how imperialism effected the relationships between European powers and Japan was quickly changing because competition for land in places like Africa and Asia were being taken up and resources in these areas were becoming valuable to all of the countries involved to build there empires.
Explanation:
D : To promote Ibro-American cinema
Here are the answers to the rest of the test too
1. Ayer lo compre
2. to promote Ibero-American cinema
3. from the valley in which it originated
4. El banco se cierra a la una
5. Fuimos al centro
6. the accordion
7. el champu
8. echar una carta
9. Los vi.
10. Only films from Spanish-speaking countries are screened.
Answer:
Santa Fe Independent School District v. Doe, case in which the U.S. Supreme Court on June 19, 2000, ruled (6–3) that a Texas school board policy that allowed “student-led, student-initiated prayer” before varsity high-school football games was a violation of the First Amendment’s establishment clause, which generally prohibits the government from establishing, advancing, or giving favour to any religion.
the issue that eventually reached the U.S. Supreme Court concerned a policy that called for students to vote on whether prayers would be delivered prior to football games and to select a student who would deliver them. After the students approved the inclusion of prayers at the game, a federal district court ruled that only nonsectarian and nonproselytizing prayers could be delivered. The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, however, ruled that any football prayer was unconstitutional, as a violation of the establishment clause.
The school board contended that control of the pregame message was left to students who also chose the speaker and the content of the message by a majority vote. Thus, according to the board, the prayer qualified as “private speech” and was protected by the First Amendment’s free speech and free exercise clauses. However, the court ruled that The court was of the opinion that the policy would only lead to student messages that were, rather than private speech, actually religious speech directly sponsored and endorsed by a governmental agency.