Answer: Many of the delegates to the Constitutional Convention had serious reservations about democracy, which they believed promoted anarchy. To allay these fears, the Constitution blunted democratic tendencies that appeared to undermine the republic. Thus, to avoid giving the people too much direct power, the delegates made certain that senators were chosen by the state legislatures, not elected directly by the people (direct elections of senators came with the Seventeenth Amendment to the Constitution, ratified in 1913). As an additional safeguard, the delegates created the Electoral College, the mechanism for choosing the president. Under this plan, each state has a certain number of electors, which is its number of senators (two) plus its number of representatives in the House of Representatives. Critics, then as now, argue that this process prevents the direct election of the president.
Explanation:
<span>Other than Martin Luther, Calvin did because he was basically the person who started Calvinism which led to Puritans. Also the logic that in America we still like to save money and work hard came from Calvin.</span>
The correct answer is <span>Although Union troops greatly outnumbered Confederate troops, it took months for the North to achieve victory.
The Union had more than a double the amount of army that the Confederacy had and they still couldn't enter Petersburg easily with the siege lasting for over 9 months. It wasn't a classic siege but rather a form of trench warfare where they couldn't move towards Petersburg even though they greatly outnumbered the confederate forces.</span>
Answer:
Similarities--- Muslims, armies and contribution to the art.
differences--- languages and sects
Explanation:
Both empires taxed the non-Muslims living in their kingdom. Both fought with each other to gain power and increase their lands. Both have powerful armies which help them to expanding their lands. Both empires contributed in the field of art, literature and architecture. The main difference between them was that the Ottomans were Sunni while the Safavids were Shiite Muslims. They spoke different language, the Ottomans spoke Turkish while the Safavids spoke Persian language.
This statement is technically valid in the sense that both the Federalist and Anti-Federalists believed in the future of the Union--it was just that they differed on how they thought the Union would progress.
